ArticleScientific reports2020
Increased Prediction Accuracy Using Combined Genomic Information and Physiological Traits in A Soft Wheat Panel Evaluated in Multi-Environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of low-density high-throughput marker platform and easy-to-measure traits for genomic prediction of biomass yield in oat (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Precision Breeding in Peanut (Insects · 2026Review
- Optimizing biomass partitioning in wheat using UAV-based hyperspectral phenomic and genomic prediction: kernel-based and machine learning approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Physiological determinants of heterosis in hybrid rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Integration of physiological and remote sensing traits for improved genomic prediction of wheat yield.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Enhancing prediction accuracy of key biomass partitioning traits in wheat using multi-kernel genomic prediction models integrating secondary traits and environmental covariates.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Enhancing genomic-based forward prediction accuracy in wheat by integrating UAV-derived hyperspectral and environmental data with machine learning under heat-stressed environments.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Article
- What plant breeding may (and may not) look like in 2050?The plant genome · 2024Review
- Robotized indoor phenotyping allows genomic prediction of adaptive traits in the field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Prediction of near-term climate change impacts on UK wheat quality and the potential for adaptation through plant breeding.Global change biology · 2023Article
- Genomics combined with UAS data enhances prediction of grain yield in winter wheat.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Multi-trait genomic prediction using in-season physiological parameters increases prediction accuracy of complex traits in US wheat.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Harnessing Genetic Diversity in the USDA Pea Germplasm Collection Through Genomic Prediction.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes.Genes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An integration of field-based phenotypic and genomic data can potentially increase the genetic gain in wheat breeding for complex traits such as grain and biomass yield. To validate this hypothesis in empirical field experiments, we compared the prediction accuracy between multi-kernel physiological and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) model to a single-kernel physiological or genomic BLUP model for grain yield (GY) using a soft wheat population that was evaluated in four environments. The physiological data including canopy temperature (CT), SPAD chlorophyll content (SPAD), membrane thermostability (MT), rate of senescence (RS), stay green trait (SGT), and NDVI values were collected at four environments (2016, 2017, and 2018 at Citra, FL; 2017 at Quincy, FL). Using a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach, a total of 19,353 SNPs were generated and used to estimate prediction model accuracy. Prediction accuracies of grain yield evaluated in four environments improved when physiological traits and/or interaction effects (genotype × environment or physiology × environment) were included in the model compared to models with only genomic data. The proposed multi-kernel models that combined physiological and genomic data showed 35 to 169% increase in prediction accuracy compared to models with only genomic data included when heading date was used as a covariate. In general, higher response to selection was captured by the model combing effects of physiological and genotype × environment interaction compared to other models. The results of this study support the integration of field-based physiological data into GY prediction to improve genetic gain from selection in soft wheat under a multi-environment context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.