ArticleClinical spine surgery2020
Predictors for Deformity Progression in a Spinal Muscular Atrophy Cohort After Scoliosis Correction Surgery.
Article in Clinical spine surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy in the era of disease-modifying therapy: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Scoliosis Orthopedic Surgery Combined With Nusinersen Intrathecal Injection Significantly Improved the Outcome of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patient: A Case Report.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis was a single-center, retrospective study.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the risk factors for deformity progression after scoliosis correction surgery in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Moderate residual postoperative scoliosis curve is common in SMA populations; however, the acceptable postoperative scoliosis curve for preventing deformity progression remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-nine SMA patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery were included. Scoliosis progression was defined as an increase of 10 degrees in the major curve of Cobb angle (MCCA); pelvic obliquity (PO) or concave-side hip progression was arbitrarily defined as an increase of ≥1 grade after surgery. Risk factors for deformity progression were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. The cumulative incidence rate of deformity progression was performed by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis
results: The mean age at surgery was 13.3 years (range: 8-25 y) and the mean follow-up time was 7 years (range: 2-22.9 y). The mean MCCA was corrected from 69 to 34.6 degrees at initial follow-up and 42.2 degrees at the final follow-up. Postoperative MCCA (P=0.002) and PO (P=0.004) at initial follow-up were the risk factors for scoliosis progression. Postoperative MCCA at initial follow-up (P=0.007) and age at the time of surgery (P=0.017) were the risk factors for PO progression. Different cutoff points of postoperative MCCA at initial follow-up were compared for predicting deformity progression. We found the patient with postoperative MCCA of <30 degrees at initial follow-up had a significantly less cumulative incidence rate of progression than their counterparts for scoliosis (P=0.005), PO (P=0.023), and concave-side hip progressions (P=0.008).
conclusionsWe recommended that MCCA should be corrected to <30 degrees to prevent postoperative scoliosis, PO, and concave-side femoral head coverage percentage progressions. Patients receiving surgery earlier had less postoperative MCCA at initial follow-up but with no increase in the risk of postoperative scoliosis progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.