Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32341191›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Budgetary impact from multiple perspectives of sustained antitobacco national media campaigns to reduce the harms of cigarette smoking.

Michael V Maciosek, Brian S Armour, Stephen D Babb, Steven P Dehmer, Elizabeth S Grossman, David M Homa, Amy B LaFrance, Robert Rodes, Xu Wang, Zack Xu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael V MaciosekHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA michael.v.maciosek@healthpartners.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-8858
Brian S ArmourOffice on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Stephen D BabbOffice on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Steven P DehmerHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Elizabeth S GrossmanHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
David M HomaOffice on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Amy B LaFranceHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Robert RodesOffice on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Xu WangOffice on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Zack XuHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Zhuo YangOffice of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kakoli RoyNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-intensity antitobacco media campaigns are a proven strategy to reduce the harms of cigarette smoking. While buy-in from multiple stakeholders is needed to launch meaningful health policy, the budgetary impact of sustained media campaigns from multiple payer perspectives is unknown.

methodsWe estimated the budgetary impact and time to breakeven from societal, all-payer, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurer perspectives of national antitobacco media campaigns in the USA. Campaigns of 1, 5 and 10 years of durations were assessed in a microsimulation model to estimate the 10 and 20-year health and budgetary impact. Simulation model inputs were obtained from literature and both pubic use and proprietary data sets.

resultsThe microsimulation predicts that a 10-year national smoking cessation campaign would produce net savings of $10.4, $5.1, $1.4, $3.6 and $0.2 billion from the societal, all-payer, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurer perspectives, respectively. National antitobacco media campaigns of 1, 5 and 10-year durations could produce net savings for Medicaid and Medicare within 2 years, and for private insurers within 6-9 years. A 10-year campaign would reduce adult cigarette smoking prevalence by 1.2 percentage points, prevent 23 500 smoking-attributable deaths over the first 10 years. In sensitivity analysis, media campaign costs would be offset by reductions in medical care spending of smoking among all payers combined within 6 years in all tested scenarios.

conclusions1, 5 and 10-year antitobacco media campaigns all yield net savings within 10 years from all perspectives. Multiyear campaigns yield substantially higher savings than a 1-year campaign.

Indexed as

budgetary impactcigarette smokingeconomic analysismedia campaignnational programmes

Identifiers

PMID32341191
PMCPMC8482846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.