Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340615›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Creating value with eHealth: identification of the value proposition with key stakeholders for the resilience navigator app.

Aniek Lentferink, Louis Polstra, Austin D'Souza, Hilbrand Oldenhuis, Hugo Velthuijsen, Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aniek LentferinkPsychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, 10 De Zul, Enschede, 7522, NJ, The Netherlands. a.j.lentferink@utwente.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7205-6762
Louis PolstraMarian van Os Centre for Entrepreneurship, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Austin D'SouzaMarian van Os Centre for Entrepreneurship, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hilbrand OldenhuisMarian van Os Centre for Entrepreneurship, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hugo VelthuijsenMarian van Os Centre for Entrepreneurship, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette van Gemert-PijnenPsychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, 10 De Zul, Enschede, 7522, NJ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor a stress-management app to be persuasive and impactful, designers and developers should obtain a clear perspective of the value proposition according to key stakeholders before development. However, this is often not the case. In order to increase the chance of creating an impact by means of the Resilience Navigator app, this study aims to identify key stakeholders and work with them to gain an in-depth understanding of the value proposition of this stress-management app.

methodsThe approach used in this study builds on the approaches taken by Van Limburg et al. and Van Woezik et al. An initial list of stakeholders was identified by means of a literature scan. Stakeholders on this initial list took an online survey to identify key stakeholders with a ranking system. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of key stakeholders to identify the value proposition using the value proposition canvas as a framework for data collection. Finally, the value proposition was validated by key stakeholders during focus groups.

resultsThe key stakeholders identified included employees, employers, participation councils within organisations, HR advisors, product owners, company doctors, and business analysts. The interviews produced a list of approximately one hundred values from which fifteen core values were distilled. One example is to take into account time constraints experienced by users during stress periods. In general, the Resilience Navigator app's main goal is to increase awareness of personal stress levels and causes of stress. In addition, the sub-goal is to increase skills for effective stress management. The focus groups validated the idea that the most important values were reflected in the value proposition and had been appropriately translated into design elements, according to key stakeholders.

conclusionsA thorough, bottom-up identification and validation of the value proposition for the Resilience Navigator app was obtained, reflecting key stakeholders' varying ideas on this piece of eHealth technology. The results will facilitate the continued development of the Resilience Navigator app from the value specification phase to the design phase. In the design phase, the remaining assumptions regarding the app's value proposition should be tested using rapid prototyping.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineHumansSurveys and QuestionnaireseHealth developmentStakeholder involvementStress managementValue proposition designValue specification

Identifiers

PMID32340615
PMCPMC7184708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.