Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340355›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Exploring Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Genetically Edited Food Among Youth in Japan.

Mohamed Farid, Jianfei Cao, Yeongjoo Lim, Teruyo Arato, Kota Kodama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social Acceptance of Mobile Health among Young Adults in Japan: An Extension of the UTAUT Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed FaridGraduate School of Technology Management-MOT, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan.
Jianfei CaoGraduate School of Technology Management-MOT, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan.
Yeongjoo LimFaculty of Business Administration, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan.
Teruyo AratoHokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Kota KodamaGraduate School of Technology Management-MOT, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically edited food utilizes new techniques that may decrease all of the risks associated with genetically modified food, or "GMO" food. Safety and labeling regulations for genetically edited food are still new, and it is challenging for the consumer to differentiate it from conventional food. Although genetically edited food has the potential for reducing the risks associated with the gene introduction process, consumer perceptions toward it are still unclear. The research has compared the regulations governing GMO food and genetically edited food in Japan, Europe, and the United States. We found that the genetically edited food regulations in Japan are the most science-based, in the meaning that genetically edited food products are allowed to be sold without any safety evaluation. Based on the difference among regions, we further studied the potential acceptance level for such products among Japanese consumers, where regulation seemed science-based as policy. To understand the factors that may affect the adoption of genetically edited food among youth in Japan, we utilized the structural equation modeling (SEM) method with 180 surveys of Japanese university students to measure six factors: Knowledge, Attitude Towards Technology, Perceived Benefits, Perceived Risks, Trust, and Willingness to Purchase. The survey was conducted twice with an intervention in the middle to measure the effect of science communication, and we found significant differences when comparing the two datasets. The results of this survey indicate the importance of increasing knowledge and the positive role of science communication in increasing the adoption and trust of biotechnology products, such as genetically edited food.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood, Genetically ModifiedHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentFemaleFoodHumansJapanMalebenefitsconsumer acceptancegenetically edited foodjapanregulationsriskscience communicationstructural equation modelingwillingness to purchase

Identifiers

PMID32340355
PMCPMC7216076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.