Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340301›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Peptides.

Angela Di Somma, Antonio Moretta, Carolina Canè, Arianna Cirillo, Angela Duilio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A Novel Method to Monitor the Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Mechanisms ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angela Di SommaDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4916-7875
Antonio MorettaDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy.
Carolina CanèDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Arianna CirilloCEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate, 80145 Naples, Italy.
Angela DuilioDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITIstituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi · ITUniversity of Basilicata · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca ARS01- 00597-NAOCONMinistero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing onset of multidrug-resistant bacteria has propelled microbiology research towards antimicrobial peptides as new possible antibiotics from natural sources. Antimicrobial peptides are short peptides endowed with a broad range of activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and are less prone to trigger resistance. Besides their activity against planktonic bacteria, many antimicrobial peptides also show antibiofilm activity. Biofilms are ubiquitous in nature, having the ability to adhere to virtually any surface, either biotic or abiotic, including medical devices, causing chronic infections that are difficult to eradicate. The biofilm matrix protects bacteria from hostile environments, thus contributing to the bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Biofilms are very difficult to treat, with options restricted to the use of large doses of antibiotics or the removal of the infected device. Antimicrobial peptides could represent good candidates to develop new antibiofilm drugs as they can act at different stages of biofilm formation, on disparate molecular targets and with various mechanisms of action. These include inhibition of biofilm formation and adhesion, downregulation of quorum sensing factors, and disruption of the pre-formed biofilm. This review focuses on the proprieties of antimicrobial and antibiofilm peptides, with a particular emphasis on their mechanism of action, reporting several examples of peptides that over time have been shown to have activity against biofilm.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPeptidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPeptidesantimicrobial peptidesbiofilmbiofilm formation inhibitionmechanism of actionresistance

Identifiers

PMID32340301
PMCPMC7226136
OpenAlexW3017832761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.