Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340232›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Application of MM-PBSA Methods in Virtual Screening.

Giulio Poli, Carlotta Granchi, Flavio Rizzolio, Tiziano Tuccinardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Virtual screening and experimental validation of a METTL3-targeting peptide withJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulio PoliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Carlotta GranchiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-0722
Flavio RizzolioDepartment of Molecular science and Nanosystems, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, 30170 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-4363
Tiziano TuccinardiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided drug design techniques are today largely applied in medicinal chemistry. In particular, receptor-based virtual screening (VS) studies, in which molecular docking represents the gold standard in silico approach, constitute a powerful strategy for identifying novel hit compounds active against the desired target receptor. Nevertheless, the need for improving the ability of docking in discriminating true active ligands from inactive compounds, thus boosting VS hit rates, is still pressing. In this context, the use of binding free energy evaluation approaches can represent a profitable tool for rescoring ligand-protein complexes predicted by docking based on more reliable estimations of ligand-protein binding affinities than those obtained with simple scoring functions. In the present review, we focused our attention on the Molecular Mechanics-Poisson Boltzman Surface Area (MM-PBSA) method for the calculation of binding free energies and its application in VS studies. We provided examples of successful applications of this method in VS campaigns and evaluation studies in which the reliability of this approach has been assessed, thus providing useful guidelines for employing this approach in VS.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingStructure-Activity RelationshipLigandsdockingMM-PBSArescoringvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID32340232
PMCPMC7221544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.