Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340230›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Mosquito-Borne Diseases Emergence/Resurgence and How to Effectively Control It Biologically.

Handi Dahmana, Oleg Mediannikov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fungal microbiota diversity inWellcome open research · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Viruses · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Repellent efficacy of water-balm formulation againstCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Characterization ofToxins · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Handi DahmanaAix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, 13005 Marseille, France.
Oleg MediannikovAix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, 13005 Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deadly pathogens and parasites are transmitted by vectors and the mosquito is considered the most threatening vector in public health, transmitting these pathogens to humans and animals. We are currently witnessing the emergence/resurgence in new regions/populations of the most important mosquito-borne diseases, such as arboviruses and malaria. This resurgence may be the consequence of numerous complex parameters, but the major cause remains the mismanagement of insecticide use and the emergence of resistance. Biological control programmes have rendered promising results but several highly effective techniques, such as genetic manipulation, remain insufficiently considered as a control mechanism. Currently, new strategies based on attractive toxic sugar baits and new agents, such as

Indexed as

AsaiaBacillusbiological controlinsecticide resistancemosquito-borne diseaseparatransgenesispest controlWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID32340230
PMCPMC7238209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.