Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32339896›Full record

ReviewMedical image analysis2020

Multi-atlas image registration of clinical data with automated quality assessment using ventricle segmentation.

Florian Dubost, Marleen de Bruijne, Marco Nardin, Adrian V Dalca, Kathleen L Donahue, Anne-Katrin Giese, Mark R Etherton, Ona Wu, Marius de Groot, Wiro Niessen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical image analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. MR-CT multi-atlas registration guided by fully automated brain structure segmentation with CNNs.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigation of probability maps in deep-learning-based brain ventricle parcellation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florian DubostJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: floriandubost1@gmail.com.
Marleen de BruijneBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marco NardinJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adrian V DalcaComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Kathleen L DonahueJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Anne-Katrin GieseJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Mark R EthertonJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Ona WuAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Marius de GrootBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wiro NiessenBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Science, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Meike VernooijDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Natalia S RostJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Markus D SchirmerJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Germany. Electronic address: mschirmer1@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
MRI-GENetics Interface Exploration_MRI-GENIE_StudyR01NS086905 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROST, NATALIA S · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
Statins augment small vessel function and improve stroke outcomesR01NS082285 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROST, NATALIA S · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Genetic variation in white matter hyperintensity and risk of ischemic strokeK23NS064052 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROST, NATALIA S · 2009 to 2013
$915k
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS064052NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082285NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Registration is a core component of many imaging pipelines. In case of clinical scans, with lower resolution and sometimes substantial motion artifacts, registration can produce poor results. Visual assessment of registration quality in large clinical datasets is inefficient. In this work, we propose to automatically assess the quality of registration to an atlas in clinical FLAIR MRI scans of the brain. The method consists of automatically segmenting the ventricles of a given scan using a neural network, and comparing the segmentation to the atlas ventricles propagated to image space. We used the proposed method to improve clinical image registration to a general atlas by computing multiple registrations - one directly to the general atlas and others via different age-specific atlases - and then selecting the registration that yielded the highest ventricle overlap. Finally, as an example application of the complete pipeline, a voxelwise map of white matter hyperintensity burden was computed using only the scans with registration quality above a predefined threshold. Methods were evaluated in a single-site dataset of more than 1000 scans, as well as a multi-center dataset comprising 142 clinical scans from 12 sites. The automated ventricle segmentation reached a Dice coefficient with manual annotations of 0.89 in the single-site dataset, and 0.83 in the multi-center dataset. Registration via age-specific atlases could improve ventricle overlap compared to a direct registration to the general atlas (Dice similarity coefficient increase up to 0.15). Experiments also showed that selecting scans with the registration quality assessment method could improve the quality of average maps of white matter hyperintensity burden, instead of using all scans for the computation of the white matter hyperintensity map. In this work, we demonstrated the utility of an automated tool for assessing image registration quality in clinical scans. This image quality assessment step could ultimately assist in the translation of automated neuroimaging pipelines to the clinic.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsBrainHumansNeural Networks, ComputerADNIageDeep learningMulti-atlasQualityRegistrationSegmentationventriclesWhite matter hyperintensity

Identifiers

PMID32339896
PMCPMC7275913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.