ReviewMedical image analysis2020
Multi-atlas image registration of clinical data with automated quality assessment using ventricle segmentation.
Review in Medical image analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Three Automated Measurements of Ventricular Volumes of the Brain.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing CT-based volumetric analysis via deep learning for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Novel feature-based method for multi-modal biomedical image registration compared to intensity-based technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical effect of unilateral biportal minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of patients with spinal degenerative diseases based on intelligent multimodal reconstruction technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A review of applications of automated ventricular parcellation from magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Automated ventricular segmentation and shunt failure detection using convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A 3D Sparse Autoencoder for Fully Automated Quality Control of Affine Registrations in Big Data Brain MRI Studies.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- MR-CT multi-atlas registration guided by fully automated brain structure segmentation with CNNs.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Radiomics-Derived Brain Age Predicts Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke.Neurology · 2023Article
- Investigation of probability maps in deep-learning-based brain ventricle parcellation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2023Article
- Precision medicine in stroke: towards personalized outcome predictions using artificial intelligence.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Review
- AI-based medical e-diagnosis for fast and automatic ventricular volume measurement in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus.Neural computing & applications · 2022Article
- Combined Mass Spectrometry and Histopathology Imaging for Perioperative Tissue Assessment in Cancer Surgery.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Deformable registration of chest CT images using a 3D convolutional neural network based on unsupervised learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Application of Evans Index in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients: A Mini Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
- MRI Radiomic Signature of White Matter Hyperintensities Is Associated With Clinical Phenotypes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Systematic and Comprehensive Automated Ventricle Segmentation on Ventricle Images of the Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, MR Angiography, and Baseline Data in a Systematic Multicenter Analysis of 3,301 MRI Scans of Ischemic Stroke Patients-Neuroradiological Review Within the MRI-GENIE Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Registration is a core component of many imaging pipelines. In case of clinical scans, with lower resolution and sometimes substantial motion artifacts, registration can produce poor results. Visual assessment of registration quality in large clinical datasets is inefficient. In this work, we propose to automatically assess the quality of registration to an atlas in clinical FLAIR MRI scans of the brain. The method consists of automatically segmenting the ventricles of a given scan using a neural network, and comparing the segmentation to the atlas ventricles propagated to image space. We used the proposed method to improve clinical image registration to a general atlas by computing multiple registrations - one directly to the general atlas and others via different age-specific atlases - and then selecting the registration that yielded the highest ventricle overlap. Finally, as an example application of the complete pipeline, a voxelwise map of white matter hyperintensity burden was computed using only the scans with registration quality above a predefined threshold. Methods were evaluated in a single-site dataset of more than 1000 scans, as well as a multi-center dataset comprising 142 clinical scans from 12 sites. The automated ventricle segmentation reached a Dice coefficient with manual annotations of 0.89 in the single-site dataset, and 0.83 in the multi-center dataset. Registration via age-specific atlases could improve ventricle overlap compared to a direct registration to the general atlas (Dice similarity coefficient increase up to 0.15). Experiments also showed that selecting scans with the registration quality assessment method could improve the quality of average maps of white matter hyperintensity burden, instead of using all scans for the computation of the white matter hyperintensity map. In this work, we demonstrated the utility of an automated tool for assessing image registration quality in clinical scans. This image quality assessment step could ultimately assist in the translation of automated neuroimaging pipelines to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.