Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32339491›Full record

ArticleCryobiology2020

Impacts of different synthetic polymers on vitrification of ovarian tissue.

Mohammad Hamed Shahsavari, Kele Amaral Alves, Benner Geraldo Alves, Laritza Ferreira de Lima, Diego Alberto Montano Vizcarra, Deysi Juana Dipaz Berrocal, Luciana Mascena Silva, Yago Pinto da Silva, Mary B Zelinski, José Ricardo de Figueiredo and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cryobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad Hamed ShahsavariDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Kele Amaral AlvesPostgraduate Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medicine College, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Benner Geraldo AlvesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Laritza Ferreira de LimaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Diego Alberto Montano VizcarraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Deysi Juana Dipaz BerrocalFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Luciana Mascena SilvaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Yago Pinto da SilvaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Mary B ZelinskiDivision of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR, USA.
José Ricardo de FigueiredoFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Gholamali MoghaddamDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. Electronic address: ghmoghaddam@tabrizu.ac.ir.
Ana Paula Ribeiro RodriguesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Manipulation of Oocytes and Preantral Follicles (LAMOFOPA), State University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual do Ceará · BRUniversity of Tabriz · IROregon Health & Science University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Cryopreservation and Transplantation of Ovarian Cortical Tissue for Fertility PreservationR01HD083930 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ZELINSKI, MARY B · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083930NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type and concentration of cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are important factors which influence the likelihood of a successful ovarian tissue vitrification outcome. In an attempt to address this factor, the present study was conducted to evaluate the impacts of different synthetic polymers (Supercool X-1000, Supercool Z-1000 and PVP K-12) on vitrification of bovine ovarian tissue. From each ovarian pair, fragments were recovered and immediately fixed for analysis (fresh control) or submitted to vitrification, either or not followed by in vitro culture for one or five days. Vitrification was performed using the ovarian tissue cryosystem (OTC) system. The ovarian tissues were intended for histological and viability analysis [Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and degenerate cells assay (Ethidium homodimer-1)], as well as immunolocalization of AQP3 and AQP9 were measured. The results showed that during almost all the periods after warming, in treatment groups which contain polymer (X-1000, Z-1000 and PVP), the percentage of morphologically normal follicles was the highest in the X-1000 samples. Furthermore, post-thawed X-1000 group revealed stronger labeling for AQP9 in primordial and transitional follicles, when compared with others. However, morphology after cryopreservation did not correlate with follicle viability and function where the levels of degeneration and tissue damage of PVP K-12 group were lower in comparison with X-1000 group and only in PVP K-12 group, ROS level was similar to that of the fresh control group. We believe that in addition to permeating CPAs, the addition of one (Supercool X-1000) or maybe a combination (Supercool X-1000 and PVP K-12) of non-permeating polymers could be useful to improve the outcome for vitrified bovine ovarian tissue.

Indexed as

OvaryAnimalsCattleCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFemalePolymersVitrificationCryoprotective AgentsPolymersCryoprotective agentsIn vitro cultureOvarian tissueSynthetic polymersVitrification

Identifiers

PMID32339491
PMCPMC7660932
OpenAlexW3018010535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.