Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32339229›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

The Exceptional Responders Initiative: Feasibility of a National Cancer Institute Pilot Study.

Barbara A Conley, Lou Staudt, Naoko Takebe, David A Wheeler, Linghua Wang, Maria F Cardenas, Viktoriya Korchina, Jean Claude Zenklusen, Lisa M McShane, James V Tricoli and 29 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Phase I Study of Nilotinib in Combination with Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exceptional toxicity resistance.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. One Step Further Toward Defining the Exceptional Cancer Responder.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara A ConleyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lou StaudtCenter for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Naoko TakebeDevelopmental Therapeutics Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David A WheelerHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Linghua WangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maria F CardenasHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Viktoriya KorchinaHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jean Claude ZenklusenCenter for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lisa M McShaneDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
James V TricoliDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul M WilliamsFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Irina LubenskyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Geraldine O'Sullivan-CoyneDevelopmental Therapeutics Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Elise KohnDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard F LittleDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jeffrey WhiteDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shakun MalikDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lyndsay N HarrisDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bhupinder MannDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carol WeilDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Roy TarnuzzerCenter for Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chris KarlovichFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Brian RodgersDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lalitha ShankarDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paula M JacobsDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tracy NolanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sean M BerrymanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Julie Gastier-FosterNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Jay BowenNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Kristen LeraasNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Hui ShenVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Peter W LairdVan Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Manel EstellerJosep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Vincent MillerFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Adrienne JohnsonFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Elijah F EdmondsonPathology and Histology Laboratory, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Thomas J GiordanoDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Benjamin KimDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
S Percy IvyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USBaylor College of Medicine · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USFoundation Medicine (United States)Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USVan Andel Institute · USJosep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute · ESLeidos (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

The BCM Tumor Genome Characterization CenterU24CA143843 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A, WHEELER, DAVID ANDREW · 2009 to 2013
$9.5M
Integrative Cancer Epigenomic Data Analysis Center (ICE-DAC)U24CA210969 · NCI · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LAIRD, PETER W · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Integrative Cancer Epigenomic Data Analysis Center (ICE-DAC)U24CA264023 · NCI · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LAIRD, PETER W, SHEN, HUI · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS HHSN261201700005CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201700005INCI NIH HHS U24 CA143843NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210969NCI NIH HHS U24 CA264023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor molecular profiling from patients experiencing exceptional responses to systemic therapy may provide insights into cancer biology and improve treatment tailoring. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of identifying exceptional responders retrospectively, obtaining pre-exceptional response treatment tumor tissues, and analyzing them with state-of-the-art molecular analysis tools to identify potential molecular explanations for responses.

methodsExceptional response was defined as partial (PR) or complete (CR) response to a systemic treatment with population PR or CR rate less than 10% or an unusually long response (eg, duration >3 times published median). Cases proposed by patients' clinicians were reviewed by clinical and translational experts. Tumor and normal tissue (if possible) were profiled with whole exome sequencing and, if possible, targeted deep sequencing, RNA sequencing, methylation arrays, and immunohistochemistry. Potential germline mutations were tracked for relevance to disease.

resultsCases reflected a variety of tumors and standard and investigational treatments. Of 520 cases, 476 (91.5%) were accepted for further review, and 222 of 476 (46.6%) proposed cases met requirements as exceptional responders. Clinical data were obtained from 168 of 222 cases (75.7%). Tumor was provided from 130 of 168 cases (77.4%). Of 117 of the 130 (90.0%) cases with sufficient nucleic acids, 109 (93.2%) were successfully analyzed; 6 patients had potentially actionable germline mutations.

conclusionExceptional responses occur with standard and investigational treatment. Retrospective identification of exceptional responders, accessioning, and sequencing of pretreatment archived tissue is feasible. Data from molecular analyses of tumors, particularly when combining results from patients who received similar treatments, may elucidate molecular bases for exceptional responses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overExome SequencingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsPrecision MedicineRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32339229
PMCPMC7781457
OpenAlexW3018770601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.