Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32339160›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml).

Yumei Jiang, Xiaojing Bai, Xinwei Zhang, Meiyu Wang, Juanhua Tian, Lijun Mu, Na Zhang, Man Li, Yuefeng Du

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yumei JiangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Xiaojing BaiDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Xinwei ZhangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Meiyu WangDepartment of Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Juanhua TianDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Lijun MuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Na ZhangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Man LiDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Yuefeng DuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) vs. transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) more than 80 ml. MATERIAL AND METHODS From June 2015 to February 2019, 179 BPH patients with prostate volume greater than 80 ml were enrolled and separated into a PKEP (n=81) group and a PKRP group (n=98). The patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 6 months. We collected and analyzed data from the international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), residual urine volume (RUV), quality of life (QOL), maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and international erectile function index (ILEF-5). The clinical data collected during and after the operation and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS The PKEP group had significantly shorter operation time, bladder flushing time, indwelling catheter time, and hospitalization time, and has less intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, capsule perforation, and retrograde ejaculation (P<0.05). Compared with the PKRP group, the postoperative IPSS and QOL scores were significantly lower in the PKEP group (P<0.05), while the excision glandular tissue weight and Qmax were significantly improved (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in ILEF-5 scores, RUV, urethral stricture, urinary incontinence, or erectile dysfunction between the 2 groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS PKEP treatment of BPH with a large volume (>80 ml) has the advantages of complete gland resection, good surgical effect, improved surgical safety, and reduced intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Indexed as

AgedAsian PeopleChinaErectile DysfunctionHumansHyperplasiaMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodProstateProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeTransurethral Resection of ProstateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32339160
PMCPMC7199430
OpenAlexW3019696066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.