Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338932›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2020

Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in a randomized clinical trial for binge-eating disorder.

Lisa M Anderson, Kathryn M Smith, Lauren M Schaefer, Ross D Crosby, Li Cao, Scott G Engel, Scott J Crow, Stephen A Wonderlich, Carol B Peterson

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-1498
Kathryn M SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and The Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California.
Lauren M SchaeferSanford Center for Biobehavioral Research.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-7598
Ross D CrosbySanford Center for Biobehavioral Research.
Li CaoSanford Center for Biobehavioral Research.
Scott G EngelSanford Center for Biobehavioral Research.
Scott J CrowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School.
Stephen A WonderlichSanford Center for Biobehavioral Research.
Carol B PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School.
Sanford Research · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USCalifornia Southern University · US

Funding

Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
Integrative Cognitive Affective Therapy for Binge Eating DisorderR34MH098995 · NIMH · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2013 to 2015
$696k
1/2-Integrative Cognitive Affective Therapy for Binge Eating DisorderR34MH099040 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PETERSON, CAROL B. · 2013 to 2015
$684k
National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental HealthNIMH NIH HHS R34 MH098995NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099040NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study examined predictors and moderators of two interventions for binge-eating disorder (BED).

methodParticipants were 112 adults with BED (

resultsLower levels of baseline dietary restraint and emotion regulation difficulties predicted greater reductions in OBE frequency at EOT and FU, respectively. At EOT, greater pretreatment self-control predicted greater reductions in OBE frequency in ICAT-BED than CBTgsh (

conclusionThis study identified two general predictors and four moderators of BED treatment response. However, only one predictor (actual-ideal self-discrepancy) interacted with treatment type to differentially predict OBE frequencies at both EOT and FU. Altogether, findings suggest that ICAT-BED may confer specific and durable improvements in OBE frequencies among individuals with high actual-ideal self-discrepancy. Therefore, patients demonstrating these characteristics may be more likely to benefit from ICAT-BED. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultBinge-Eating DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32338932
PMCPMC7970631
OpenAlexW3019140975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.