Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338621›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2020

Effectiveness of a Home-Based Rehabilitation Program After Total Hip Arthroplasty Driven by a Tablet App and Remote Coaching: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial Combining a Single-Arm Intervention Cohort With Historical Controls.

Annet Wijnen, Jildou Hoogland, Tjerk Munsterman, Carina LE Gerritsma, Baukje Dijkstra, Wierd P Zijlstra, Johan S Dekker, Janneke Annegarn, Francisco Ibarra, Geranda Ec Slager and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03846063 (Pilot Study Into the Development of an Effective Home-based-exercise-strategy for Patients After THA Delivered on a Tablet-PC), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03846063 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Study Into the Development of an Effective Home-based-exercise-strategy for Patients After THA Delivered on a Tablet-PC

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Hip, Total Hip ArthroplastyArmsHome-based rehabilitation program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annet WijnenDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-2952
Jildou HooglandDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-5709
Tjerk MunstermanDepartment of Physiotherapy, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-9911
Carina LE GerritsmaDepartment of Orthopedics, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-8951
Baukje DijkstraDepartment of Orthopedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-2161
Wierd P ZijlstraDepartment of Orthopedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3824
Johan S DekkerDepartment of Orthopedics, Ommelander Ziekenhuis Groep, Scheemda, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-9934
Janneke AnnegarnCollaborative Care Solutions, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-906X
Francisco IbarraUniversity of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-5638
Geranda Ec SlagerDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-3101
Wiebren ZijlstraInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-1575
Martin StevensDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-6894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent technological developments such as wearable sensors and tablets with a mobile internet connection hold promise for providing electronic health home-based programs with remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty. It can be hypothesized that such a home-based rehabilitation program can offer an effective alternative to usual care.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a home-based rehabilitation program driven by a tablet app and remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty.

methodsExisting data of two studies were combined, in which patients of a single-arm intervention study were matched with historical controls of an observational study. Patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone total hip arthroplasty as a treatment for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were included. The intervention consisted of a 12-week home-based rehabilitation program with video instructions on a tablet and remote coaching (intervention group). Patients were asked to do strengthening and walking exercises at least 5 days a week. Data of the intervention group were compared with those of patients who received usual care (control group). Effectiveness was measured at four moments (preoperatively, and 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively) by means of functional tests (Timed Up & Go test and the Five Times Sit-to Stand Test) and self-reported questionnaires (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and Short Form 36 [SF-36]). Each patient of the intervention group was matched with two patients of the control group. Patient characteristics were summarized with descriptive statistics. The 1:2 matching situation was analyzed with a conditional logistic regression. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen d.

resultsOverall, 15 patients of the intervention group were included in this study, and 15 and 12 subjects from the control group were matched to the intervention group, respectively. The intervention group performed functional tests significantly faster at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The intervention group also scored significantly higher on the subscales "function in sport and recreational activities" and "hip-related quality of life" of HOOS, and on the subscale "physical role limitations" of SF-36 at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Large effect sizes were found on functional tests at 12 weeks and at 6 months (Cohen d=0.5-1.2), endorsed by effect sizes on the self-reported outcomes.

conclusionsOur results clearly demonstrate larger effects in the intervention group compared to the historical controls. These results imply that a home-based rehabilitation program delivered by means of internet technology after total hip arthroplasty can be more effective than usual care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03846063; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03846063 and German Registry of Clinical Trials DRKS00011345; https://tinyurl.com/yd32gmdo.

Indexed as

home-based rehabilitation programinternetosteoarthritisphysiotherapyrehabilitationremote coachingtablet apptotal hip arthroplastytotal hip replacementusual care

Identifiers

PMID32338621
PMCPMC7215512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.