ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020
App-based Self-administrable Clinical Tests of Physical Function: Development and Usability Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unsupervised Functional Capacity Testing at Home: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Pooled it
- Mobile health applications for older adults: a systematic review of interface and persuasive feature design.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Perception of Purposeful and Recreational Smartphone Use in Physiotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
- A mobile exercise management application based on exercise preferences in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a development and usability study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Designing interfaces for digital physical ability self-assessment: a user-centered iterative approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Reliability of digitally instructed self-reported 30-second chair stand test for lower extremity function.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- A Smartphone-Based Timed Up and Go Test Self-Assessment for Older Adults: Validity and Reliability Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Article
- Measuring Physical Functioning Using Wearable Sensors in Parkinson Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (the Accuracy of Digital Assessment of Performance Trial Study): Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Enhancing public health in developing nations through smartphone-based motor assessment.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Implementation of digital health technologies for older adults: a scoping review.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
- Co-Creating a Digital Life-Integrated Self-Assessment for Older Adults: User Experience Study.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Usability and feasibility of a tablet-based e-coach for older adults in rehabilitation units to improve nutrition and physical activity: a prospective pilot study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Digital Health Service for Identification of Frailty Risk Factors in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The SUNFRAIL+ Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Development of a mobile application for assessing reaction time in walking and TUG duration: Concurrent validity in female older adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Development and functioning of the mobile app-based mh-GAP intervention guide in detection and treatment of people with mental health conditions in primary healthcare settings in Nepal.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Iterative Development and Applicability of a Tablet-Based e-Coach for Older Adults in Rehabilitation Units to Improve Nutrition and Physical Activity: Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Feasibility of performance-based and self-reported outcomes in self-managed falls prevention exercise interventions for independent older adults living in the community.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObjective measures of physical function in older adults are widely used to predict health outcomes such as disability, institutionalization, and mortality. App-based clinical tests allow users to assess their own physical function and have objective tracking of changes over time by use of their smartphones. Such tests can potentially guide interventions remotely and provide more detailed prognostic information about the participant's physical performance for the users, therapists, and other health care personnel. We developed 3 smartphone apps with instrumented versions of the Timed Up and Go (Self-TUG), tandem stance (Self-Tandem), and Five Times Sit-to-Stand (Self-STS) tests.
objectiveThis study aimed to test the usability of 3 smartphone app-based self-tests of physical function using an iterative design.
methodsThe apps were tested in 3 iterations: the first (n=189) and second (n=134) in a lab setting and the third (n=20) in a separate home-based study. Participants were healthy adults between 60 and 80 years of age. Assessors observed while participants self-administered the tests without any guidance. Errors were recorded, and usability problems were defined. Problems were addressed in each subsequent iteration. Perceived usability in the home-based setting was assessed by use of the System Usability Scale, the User Experience Questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews.
resultsIn the first iteration, 7 usability problems were identified; 42 (42/189, 22.0%) and 127 (127/189, 67.2%) participants were able to correctly perform the Self-TUG and Self-Tandem, respectively. In the second iteration, errors caused by the problems identified in the first iteration were drastically reduced, and 108 (108/134, 83.1%) and 106 (106/134, 79.1%) of the participants correctly performed the Self-TUG and Self-Tandem, respectively. The first version of the Self-STS was also tested in this iteration, and 40 (40/134, 30.1%) of the participants performed it correctly. For the third usability test, the 7 usability problems initially identified were further improved. Testing the apps in a home setting gave rise to some new usability problems, and for Self-TUG and Self-STS, the rates of correctly performed trials were slightly reduced from the second version, while for Self-Tandem, the rate increased. The mean System Usability Scale score was 77.63 points (SD 16.1 points), and 80-95% of the participants reported the highest or second highest positive rating on all items in the User Experience Questionnaire.
conclusionsThe study results suggest that the apps have the potential to be used to self-test physical function in seniors in a nonsupervised home-based setting. The participants reported a high degree of ease of use. Evaluating the usability in a home setting allowed us to identify new usability problems that could affect the validity of the tests. These usability problems are not easily found in the lab setting, indicating that, if possible, app usability should be evaluated in both settings. Before being made available to end users, the apps require further improvements and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.