Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338595›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Differentiating between integration and non-integration strategies in perceptual decision making.

Gabriel M Stine, Ariel Zylberberg, Jochen Ditterich, Michael N Shadlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Addressing degeneracy in rodent studies of cognition.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From symptom-based heterogeneity to mechanism-based profiling in youth ADHD: the promise of computational psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Neural mechanisms of flexible perceptual inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrated Ising model with global inhibition for decision-making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Ising Model with global inhibition for decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Neural Decision Signal during Internal Sampling from Working Memory in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel M StineDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4906-0461
Ariel ZylberbergMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and The Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-4748
Jochen DitterichCenter for Neuroscience and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, University of California, Davis, United States.
Michael N ShadlenDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2002-2210

Funding

Vision Sciences Training GrantT32EY013933 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Carol A. Mason, CAROL M TROY · 2001 to 2026
$5.3M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL PERCEPTIONR01EY011378 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHADLEN, MICHAEL NEIL · 1996 to 2017
$3.8M
Computational and circuit mechanisms of decision makingR01NS113113 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHADLEN, MICHAEL NEIL · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS EY011378NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013933NINDS NIH HHS NS113113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many tasks used to study decision-making encourage subjects to integrate evidence over time. Such tasks are useful to understand how the brain operates on multiple samples of information over prolonged timescales, but only if subjects actually integrate evidence to form their decisions. We explored the behavioral observations that corroborate evidence-integration in a number of task-designs. Several commonly accepted signs of integration were also predicted by non-integration strategies. Furthermore, an integration model could fit data generated by non-integration models. We identified the features of non-integration models that allowed them to mimic integration and used these insights to design a motion discrimination task that disentangled the models. In human subjects performing the task, we falsified a non-integration strategy in each and confirmed prolonged integration in all but one subject. The findings illustrate the difficulty of identifying a decision-maker's strategy and support solutions to achieve this goal.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalMotion PerceptionBrainFemaleHumansMaleMotionbehavioral modelingdecision makingevidence accumulationhumanneuroscienceperceptual decisions

Identifiers

PMID32338595
PMCPMC7217695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.