Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338334›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2021

The role of non-invasive devices for the telemonitoring of heart failure patients.

A Faragli, D Abawi, C Quinn, M Cvetkovic, T Schlabs, E Tahirovic, H-D Düngen, B Pieske, S Kelle, F Edelmann and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A FaragliDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
D AbawiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
C QuinnDepartment of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY, USA.
M CvetkovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
T SchlabsDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
E TahirovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
H-D DüngenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
B PieskeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
S KelleDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
F EdelmannDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Alessio AlognaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. alessio.alogna@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) patients represent one of the most prevalent as well as one of the most fragile population encountered in the cardiology and internal medicine departments nowadays. Estimated to account for around 26 million people worldwide, diagnosed patients present a poor prognosis and quality of life with a clinical history accompanied by repeated hospital admissions caused by an exacerbation of their chronic condition. The frequent hospitalizations and the extended hospital stays mean an extremely high economic burden for healthcare institutions. Meanwhile, the number of chronically diseased and elderly patients is continuously rising, and a lack of specialized physicians is evident. To cope with this health emergency, more efficient strategies for patient management, more accurate diagnostic tools, and more efficient preventive plans are needed. In recent years, telemonitoring has been introduced as the potential answer to solve such needs. Different methodologies and devices have been progressively investigated for effective home monitoring of cardiologic patients. Invasive hemodynamic devices, such as CardioMEMS™, have been demonstrated to be reducing hospitalizations and mortality, but their use is however restricted to limited cases. The role of external non-invasive devices for remote patient monitoring, instead, is yet to be clarified. In this review, we summarized the most relevant studies and devices that, by utilizing non-invasive telemonitoring, demonstrated whether beneficial effects in the management of HF patients were effective.

Indexed as

Heart FailureTelemedicineAgedChronic DiseaseHospitalizationHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicQuality of LifeHeart failureMedical devicesNon-invasiveTelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID32338334
PMCPMC8310471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.