Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338291›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

Re-evaluation of the nor mutation and the role of the NAC-NOR transcription factor in tomato fruit ripening.

Ying Gao, Wei Wei, Zhongqi Fan, Xiaodan Zhao, Yiping Zhang, Yuan Jing, Benzhong Zhu, Hongliang Zhu, Wei Shan, Jianye Chen and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ying GaoLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wei WeiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Postharvest Science of Fruits and Vegetables, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongqi FanState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Postharvest Science of Fruits and Vegetables, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodan ZhaoSchool of Food and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China.
Yiping ZhangLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yuan JingLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Benzhong ZhuLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hongliang ZhuLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wei ShanState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Postharvest Science of Fruits and Vegetables, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianye ChenState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Postharvest Science of Fruits and Vegetables, College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Donald GriersonCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yunbo LuoLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Tomislav JemrićDepartment of Pomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Cai-Zhong JiangDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Da-Qi FuLaboratory of Fruit Biology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tomato non-ripening (nor) mutant generates a truncated 186-amino-acid protein (NOR186) and has been demonstrated previously to be a gain-of-function mutant. Here, we provide more evidence to support this view and answer the open question of whether the NAC-NOR gene is important in fruit ripening. Overexpression of NAC-NOR in the nor mutant did not restore the full ripening phenotype. Further analysis showed that the truncated NOR186 protein is located in the nucleus and binds to but does not activate the promoters of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase2 (SlACS2), geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase2 (SlGgpps2), and pectate lyase (SlPL), which are involved in ethylene biosynthesis, carotenoid accumulation, and fruit softening, respectively. The activation of the promoters by the wild-type NOR protein can be inhibited by the mutant NOR186 protein. On the other hand, ethylene synthesis, carotenoid accumulation, and fruit softening were significantly inhibited in CR-NOR (CRISPR/Cas9-edited NAC-NOR) fruit compared with the wild-type, but much less severely affected than in the nor mutant, while they were accelerated in OE-NOR (overexpressed NAC-NOR) fruit. These data further indicated that nor is a gain-of-function mutation and NAC-NOR plays a significant role in ripening of wild-type fruit.

Indexed as

Solanum lycopersicumEthylenesFruitGene Expression Regulation, PlantMutationPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsEthylenesPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsCRISPR/Cas9gene functionNAC-NORnor mutanttomato fruit ripeningtranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID32338291
PMCPMC7307841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.