Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32338266›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2020

Microfluidic device for high-throughput affinity-based isolation of extracellular vesicles.

Ting-Wen Lo, Ziwen Zhu, Emma Purcell, Daniel Watza, Joyful Wang, Yoon-Tae Kang, Shruti Jolly, Deepak Nagrath, Sunitha Nagrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. TiOBioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ting-Wen LoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. snagrath@umich.edu.
Ziwen Zhu
Emma Purcell
Daniel Watza
Joyful Wang
Yoon-Tae Kang
Shruti Jolly
Deepak Nagrath
Sunitha Nagrath

Funding

Environmental Regulation of Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity in MetastasisU01CA210152 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAHANN, JOERG, LUKER, GARY D · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Label free microfluidic isolation, characterization and ex vivo expansion of CTCsR01CA208335 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, SUNITHA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Targeting Stromal Influences on Glutamine Addiction in Ovarian CancerR01CA227622 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOK, SAMUEL C, NAGRATH, DEEPAK · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Identification of USP13 as a therapeutic target for ovarian cancerR01CA222251 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LU, XIONGBIN, NAGRATH, DEEPAK · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Uncovering Role of Exosomes in Regulating Pancreatic Cancer Cell MetabolismR01CA204969 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, DEEPAK · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204969NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208335NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222251NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227622NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoaffinity based EV isolation technologies use antibodies targeting surface markers on EVs to provide higher isolation specificity and purity compared to existing approaches. One standing challenge for researchers is how to release captured EVs from the substrate to increase downstream and biological studies. The strong binding between the antibody and antigen or the antibody and substrate is commonly unbreakable without operating at conditions outside of the critical physiological range, making the release of EVs problematic. Additionally, immuno-affinity approaches are usually low-throughput due to their low flow velocity to ensure adequate time for antibody-antigen binding. To overcome these limitations, we modified the OncoBean chip, a previously reported circulating tumor cell isolation microfluidic device. The OncoBean chip is a radial flow microfluidic device with bean-shape microposts functionalized with biotin-conjugated EPCAM antibody through biotin-avidin link chemistry. It was demonstrated that the high surface area and varying shear rate provided by the bean-shaped posts and the radial flow design in the chip, enabled efficient capture of CTCs at high flow rate. We replace the anti-EPCAM with antibodies that recognize common EV surface markers to achieve high-throughput EV isolation. Moreover, by incorporating desthiobiotin-conjugated antibodies, EVs can be released from the device after capture, which offers a significant improvement over the existing isolation. The released EVs were found to be functional by confirming their uptake by cells using flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy. We believe the proposed technology can facilitate both the study of EVs as cell-to-cell communicators and the further identification of EV markers.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingFlow CytometryHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicroscopy, Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID32338266
PMCPMC7328786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.