Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337836›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

A co-designed framework to support and sustain patient and family engagement in health-care decision making.

Tamara L McCarron, Thomas Noseworthy, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L Lorenzetti, Nancy J Marlett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences of people with Long Covid with a digital physiotherapy intervention: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Parents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in adolescents' inpatient mental healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. The impact of COVID-19 on patient engagement in the health system: Results from a Pan-Canadian survey of patient, family and caregiver partners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Organizational capacity for patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: interviews with patient/family advisors, managers and clinicians.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Article
  16. How do health services engage culturally and linguistically diverse consumers? An analysis of consumer engagement frameworks in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A co-designed framework to support and sustain patient and family engagement in health-care decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  20. 23.4 Briefing.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tamara L McCarronThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7242-1910
Thomas NoseworthyThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karen MoffatThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gloria WilkinsonThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sandra ZelinskyThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Deborah WhiteFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary in Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Derek HassayHaskayne School of Business, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Diane L LorenzettiThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nancy J MarlettThe Department Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-1894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and family engagement in health care has emerged as a critical priority. Understanding engagement, from the perspective of the patient and family member, coupled with an awareness of how patient and family members are motivated to be involved, is an important component in increasing the effectiveness of patient engagement initiatives. The purpose of this research was to co-design a patient and family engagement framework.

methodsWorkshops were held to provide additional context to the findings from a survey. Participants were recruited using a convenience sampling strategy. Workshop data collected were analysed using a modified constant comparative technique. The core research team participated in a workshop to review the findings from multiple inputs to inform the final framework and participated in a face validity exercise to determine that the components of the framework measured what they were intended to measure.

resultsThe framework is organized into three phases of engagement: why I got involved; why I continue to be involved; and what I need to strengthen my involvement. The final framework describes seven motivations and 24 statements, arranged by the three phases of engagement.

conclusionThe results of this research describe the motivations of patient and family members who are involved with health systems in various roles including as patient advisors. A deeper knowledge of patient and family motivations will not only create meaningful engagement opportunities but will also enable health organizations to gain from the voice and experience of these individuals, thereby enhancing the quality and sustainability of patient and family involvement.

Indexed as

FamilyPatient ParticipationDecision MakingHumansMotivationResearch Designcapacity buildingmotivationpatientpatient-centredpatient participation

Identifiers

PMID32337836
PMCPMC7495064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.