ArticleCurrent medical science2020
Simple, Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginesa by Colorimetric Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification.
Article in Current medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid, sensitive, and user-friendly detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using the RPA/CRISPR/Cas12a system.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Rapid detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is a major opportunistic pathogen in hospital-acquired infections. Thus, early diagnosis is the best strategy for fighting against these infections. In this report, we incorporated multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) combined with the malachite green (MG) for rapid, sensitive, specific and visual detection of P. aeruginosa by targeting the oprl gene. The MCDA-MG assay was conducted at 67°C for only 40 min during the amplification stage, and then products were directly detected by using colorimetric indicators (MG), eliminating the use of an electrophoresis instrument or amplicon analysis equipment. The entire process, including specimen processing (35 min), amplification (40 min) and detection (5 min), can be finished within 80 min. All 30 non-P. aeruginosa strains tested negative, indicating the high specificity of the MCDA primers. The analytical sensitivity of the MCDA-MG assay was 100 fg of genomic templates per reaction in pure culture, which was in complete accordance with MCDA by gel electrophoresis and real-time turbidity. The assay was also successfully applied to detecting P. aeruginosa in stool samples. Therefore, the rapidity, simplicity, and nearly equipment-free platform of the MCDA-MG technique make it possible for clinical diagnosis, and more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32337699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.