Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337692›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2020

Involvement of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Calcium Channel in Vascular Remodeling and Endothelial Dysfunction in Rats with Pressure Overload.

Dong-Rui Chen, Hui Jiang, Jing Chen, Cheng-Chao Ruan, Wei-Qing Han, Ping-Jin Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Rui ChenState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Hui JiangState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Jing ChenState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Cheng-Chao RuanState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Wei-Qing HanState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. hanweiqing2000@163.com.
Ping-Jin GaoState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Shanghai Institute of Hypertension · CNRuijin Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular remodeling is an adaptive response to various stimuli, including mechanical forces, inflammatory cytokines and hormones. In the present study, we investigated the role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and calcium channel in carotid artery remodeling in response to increased biomechanical forces by using the transverse aortic constriction (TAC) rat model. TAC was induced on ten-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats and these models were treated with AT1R blocker olmesartan (1 mg/kg/day) or/and calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 14 days. After the treatment, the right common carotid artery proximal to the band (RCCA-B) was collected for further assay. Results showed that olmesartan, but not amlodipine, significantly prevented TAC-induced adventitial hyperplasia. Similarly, olmesartan, but not amlodipine, signifcantly prevented vascular infammation, as indicated by increased tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and increased p65 phosphorylation, an indicator of nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) activation in RCCA-B. In contrast, both olmesartan and amlodipine reversed the decreased expression of endothelial nitric oxidase synthase (eNOS) and improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation, whereas combination of olmesartan and amlodipine showed no further synergistic protective effects. These results suggest that AT1R was involved in vascular remodeling and inflammation in response to pressure overload, whereas AT1R and subsequent calcium channel were involved in endothelial dysfunction.

Indexed as

AmlodipineAnimalsCalcium ChannelsCarotid Artery InjuriesConstriction, PathologicDisease Models, AnimalHyperplasiaImidazolesMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1TetrazolesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVascular RemodelingAmlodipineCalcium ChannelsImidazolesolmesartanReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1TetrazolesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaangiotensin II type 1 receptorcalcium channelendothelial dysfunctiontransverse aortic constrictionvascular remodeling

Identifiers

PMID32337692
OpenAlexW3019596221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.