SynthesisBlood advances2020
Systematic review of observational studies reporting antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with solid tumors.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiphospholipid syndrome: epidemiology and outcomes in the evolving criteria era.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Antiphospholipid antibodies and cardiovascular thrombosis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- A Dangerous Partnership: Malignancy and Antiphospholipid Antibodies.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Malignancy Risk and Predictors in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis: A Large Population-Based Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- IgM Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Prevalence, Clinical Associations, and Diagnostic Implications-A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cancer Risk in Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Narrative Review for Practising Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- High-Risk Pregnancy with Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas Complicated by Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Report.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Cancer in Patients with Involuntary Weight Loss.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Positive antiphospholipid antibodies: observation or treatment?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Review
- Phenolics Extracted fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombotic events in ambulatory cancer patients.PloS one · 2023Article
- Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Lipids in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Association of neutrophil extracellular traps with the production of circulating DNA in patients with colorectal cancer.iScience · 2022Article
- Review
- Digital Gangrene and Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Retinoblastoma Patient with Chromosome 13q Deletion: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This review summarizes the evidence on antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and related thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors. Data sources included Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed ePubs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2019 without restrictions. Observational studies that evaluated patients with solid tumors for the presence of aPL antibodies were included. Data were extracted and quality was assessed by one reviewer and cross-checked by another. Thirty-three studies were identified. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) cancers were the most frequently reported. Compared with healthy patients, patients with GI cancer were more likely to develop anticardiolipin antibodies (risk ratio [RR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-9.95), as were those with GU (RR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.3-16.2) and lung cancer (RR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.3-20.6). The increased risk for anti-β2-glycoprotein I or lupus anticoagulant was not statistically significant. Patients with lung cancer who had positive aPL antibodies had higher risk of developing thromboembolic events than those who had negative antibodies (RR, 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.2-12.2), while the increased risk in patients with GU cancer was not statistically significant. Deaths due to thromboembolic events were more common among patients with lung cancer who had elevated aPL antibodies. A limitation of this review is that the results are contingent on the reported information. We found an increased risk of developing aPL antibodies in patients with GI, GU, and lung cancers resulting in thromboembolic events and death. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathogenesis and development of aPL antibodies in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.