Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337483›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2019

Access to Clinical Trials for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Meta-Research Analysis.

Teresa de Rojas, Anouk Neven, Mitsumi Terada, Miriam García-Abós, Lucas Moreno, Nathalie Gaspar, Julien Péron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Health behaviors among young adult cancer survivors and the importance of task self-efficacy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Access to Care for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer in the United States: State of the Literature.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Survival in Young Adults With Cancer Is Associated With Medicaid Expansion Through the Affordable Care Act.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The paediatric cancer clinical research landscape in Spain: a 13-year multicentre experience of the new agents group of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (SEHOP).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresa de RojasMedical Department, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-8423
Anouk NevenStatistics Department, Brussels, Belgium.
Mitsumi TeradaMedical Department, Brussels, Belgium.
Miriam García-AbósEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer HQ, Brussels, Belgium.
Lucas MorenoClinical Research Unit, Hospital Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Nathalie GasparDepartment of Oncology for Child and Adolescent, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Julien PéronMedical Department, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 18-year-old age limit for inclusion in clinical trials constitutes a hurdle for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. We analyzed the impact of this age barrier on the access of AYAs to cancer trials and novel therapies.

methodsClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify all the trials including patients with 10 malignancies relevant for AYAs (January 2007 to July 2018). The trials were categorized as pediatric (patients <18 y), adult (≥18 y), and transitional (including adult and pediatric patients). Transitional trials with a lower limit between 12 and 18 years and an upper limit younger than 40 years were considered AYA-specific.

resultsOf 2764 identified trials, 2176 were included: 79% adult, 19% transitional, 2% pediatric. Five trials were AYA-specific. The proportion of academic trials was higher for transitional (69%; 288 of 421) than for adult trials (48%; 832 of 1718) (

conclusionsAYAs have limited access to cancer trials and innovative therapies, with no improvement over the last decade. The 18-years-old age limit continues to be a major hurdle. Our findings are consistent with the internationally supported idea that age inclusion criteria in oncological trials should be changed.

Identifiers

PMID32337483
PMCPMC7050014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.