Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337379›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Simultaneous profiling and cultivation of the skin microbiome of healthy young adult skin for the development of therapeutic agents.

Amalia Sitti Khayyira, Aulia Elfa Rosdina, Marina Ika Irianti, Amarila Malik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Deciphering microbiome and fungi-bacteria interactions in chronic wound infections using metagenomic sequencing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Journey on the Skin Microbiome: Pitfalls and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amalia Sitti KhayyiraDivision of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, 16424, Depok, Indonesia.
Aulia Elfa RosdinaDivision of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, 16424, Depok, Indonesia.
Marina Ika IriantiDivision of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, 16424, Depok, Indonesia.
Amarila MalikDivision of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Indonesia, 16424, Depok, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on the impact of the skin microbiota on human health have been gaining more attention. Bacteria are associated with various diseases, although certain strains of bacteria, which are known as probiotics, are considered beneficial. Mixtures of several bacteria (bacterial cocktail) isolated from targeted organs have shown promising modulatory activities for use in skin therapeutics. The objectives of this study were to determine and identify the microbial communities on the skin that can potentially be used as probiotics, as determined by bacterial isolation and cultivation, followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

resultsSamples were collected by swabbing on forehead and cheek skin. Genomic DNA from bacterial swab samples were directly extracted to be further processed into NGS. Cultivation of skin bacteria was carried out in subsequent medium. Thus, around twenty bacterial isolates with different characteristics were selected and identified by both culture-based method and 16sRNA sequencing. We found that Actinobacteria and Firmicutes are the most abundant phylum present on the skin as presented by NGS data, which constitute to 67% and 28.59% of the whole bacterial population, consecutively. However,

conclusionSkin microbiome is considered to provide several probiotics for skin therapeutic. However, some opportunistic pathogens were discovered in this study population. Thus, the promising formula of bacterial cocktail for skin microbiome therapeutic must be thoroughly elucidated to avoid unwanted species. Our study is the first human skin microbiome profile of Indonesia resulted from a Next Generation Sequencing as an effort to show a representative of tropical country profile.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsGeneticsMicrobiologyMicrobiome therapeuticsMicrococcus luteusPostbioticsProbioticsSkinStaphylococcus hominisStaphylococcus warneri

Identifiers

PMID32337379
PMCPMC7176942
OpenAlexW3017717777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.