ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020
The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: A review.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Initiation of Adjuvant Therapy Following Pediatric Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Tumors.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Impact of Constipation on Reconstructive Outcomes Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025Article
- The Utility of a "Second-Look" Debridement Following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2024Article
- Special Considerations in Pediatric Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- CSF leak after pediatric endoscopic endonasal expanded approaches: a series review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Outcomes in Pediatric Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2023Article
- The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: A review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSurgery of the pediatric skull base has multiple unique challenges and has seen recent rapid advances. The objective of this review is to assess key issues in pediatric skull base surgery (SBS), including anatomic limitations, surgical approaches, reconstruction techniques, postoperative care, complications, and outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature review. REVIEW
methodsA review of the literature was conducted to assess the challenges, recent advances, and reported outcomes in pediatric SBS.
resultsThe pediatric skull base presents multiple anatomic challenges, including variable patterns of pneumatization, narrow piriform aperture width, and narrow intercarotid distance at the level of the cavernous sinus but not the superior clivus. These issues may be particularly challenging in patients less than 2 years of age. Endoscopic endonasal approaches in the sagittal and coronal plane have been applied to the pediatric skull base while open approaches may still be necessary in the setting of extensive intracranial or orbital disease, as well as disease lateral to critical neurovascular structures. While the nasoseptal flap was initially called into question for pediatric cases, it has been shown through multiple reports to be a feasible and robust reconstructive option. Complications and outcomes often depend upon the pathology. In children, response to noxious stimuli, ability to avoid Valsalva, and adherence to nasal precautions is variable. The use of lumbar drains is more common in pediatric than adult patients.
conclusionWhile the pediatric skull base presents unique challenges, outcomes data support that endoscopic endonasal approaches are a pertinent surgical technique in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.