Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337363›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020

The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: A review.

Nyall R London, Gustavo G Rangel, Patrick C Walz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early Initiation of Adjuvant Therapy Following Pediatric Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Tumors.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CSF leak after pediatric endoscopic endonasal expanded approaches: a series review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Outcomes in Pediatric Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nyall R LondonOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2902-4407
Gustavo G RangelOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Patrick C WalzOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-5210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgery of the pediatric skull base has multiple unique challenges and has seen recent rapid advances. The objective of this review is to assess key issues in pediatric skull base surgery (SBS), including anatomic limitations, surgical approaches, reconstruction techniques, postoperative care, complications, and outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature review. REVIEW

methodsA review of the literature was conducted to assess the challenges, recent advances, and reported outcomes in pediatric SBS.

resultsThe pediatric skull base presents multiple anatomic challenges, including variable patterns of pneumatization, narrow piriform aperture width, and narrow intercarotid distance at the level of the cavernous sinus but not the superior clivus. These issues may be particularly challenging in patients less than 2 years of age. Endoscopic endonasal approaches in the sagittal and coronal plane have been applied to the pediatric skull base while open approaches may still be necessary in the setting of extensive intracranial or orbital disease, as well as disease lateral to critical neurovascular structures. While the nasoseptal flap was initially called into question for pediatric cases, it has been shown through multiple reports to be a feasible and robust reconstructive option. Complications and outcomes often depend upon the pathology. In children, response to noxious stimuli, ability to avoid Valsalva, and adherence to nasal precautions is variable. The use of lumbar drains is more common in pediatric than adult patients.

conclusionWhile the pediatric skull base presents unique challenges, outcomes data support that endoscopic endonasal approaches are a pertinent surgical technique in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a.

Indexed as

endoscopic endonasal approachpediatric skull base surgeryskull base reconstructionsurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32337363
PMCPMC7178460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.