Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337296›Full record

SynthesisJournal of diabetes research2020

Relationship between Maternal Central Obesity and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Da Yao, Qing Chang, Qi-Jun Wu, Shan-Yan Gao, Huan Zhao, Ya-Shu Liu, Yu-Ting Jiang, Yu-Hong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of diabetes research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Review of Modulation of Gut Microbiota to Mitigate Gestational Diabetes: Implications for Maternal and Child Health.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Da YaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-728X
Qing ChangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qi-Jun WuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-5114
Shan-Yan GaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Huan ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ya-Shu LiuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yu-Ting JiangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yu-Hong ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6806-521X
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNowadays, body mass index (BMI) is used to evaluate the risk stratification of obesity-related pregnancy complications in clinics. However, BMI cannot reflect fat distribution or the proportion of adipose to nonadipose tissue. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of maternal first or second trimester central obesity with the risk of GDM.

resultsA total of 11 cohort studies with an overall sample size of 27,675 women and 2,226 patients with GDM were included in the analysis. The summary estimate of GDM risk in the central obesity pregnant women was 2.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.26) using the adjusted odds ratio (OR). The degree of heterogeneity among the studies was low (

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the risk of GDM was positively associated with maternal central obesity.

Indexed as

Body Fat DistributionSubcutaneous Fat, AbdominalAdultBody Mass IndexDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansObesity, AbdominalPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32337296
PMCPMC7157762
OpenAlexW3014717614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.