Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337283›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems.

Maria Gabriella Melchiorre, Roberta Papa, Sabrina Quattrini, Giovanni Lamura, Francesco Barbabella, on behalf of ICARE4EU Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Gabriella MelchiorreCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-3749
Roberta PapaCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
Sabrina QuattriniCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
Giovanni LamuraCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-9544
Francesco BarbabellaCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA, Via S. Margherita 5, 60124 Ancona, Italy.
on behalf of ICARE4EU Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductioneHealth applications have the potential to provide new integrated care services to patients with multimorbidity (MM), also supporting multidisciplinary care. The aim of this paper is to explore how widely eHealth tools have been currently adopted in integrated care programs for (older) people with MM in European countries, including benefits and barriers concerning their adoption, according to some basic health system characteristics. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2014, in the framework of the ICARE4EU project, expert organizations in 24 European countries identified 101 integrated care programs. Managers of the selected programs completed an online questionnaire on several dimensions, including the use of eHealth. We analyzed data from this questionnaire, in addition to qualitative information from six innovative programs which were studied in depth through case study methodology, according to characteristics of national health systems: a national health model (financing system), overall strength of primary care (PC) (structure/service delivery process), and level of (de)centralization of health system (executive powers in a country).

results85 programs (out of 101) adopted at least one eHealth tool, and 42 of these targeted explicitly older people. In most cases, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were used and some benefits emerged like improved care management and integration, although inadequate funding mechanisms represented a major barrier. The analysis by health system characteristics showed a greater adoption of eHealth applications in decentralized countries, in countries with a National Health Service (NHS) model, and in countries with a strong/medium level of PC development.

conclusionsAlthough in the light of some limitations, findings indicate a relation between implementation of care programs using eHealth tools and basic characteristics of health systems, with decentralization of a health system, NHS model, and strong/medium PC having a key role. However adaptations of European health systems seem necessary, in order to provide a more innovative and integrated care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedMultimorbidityAdministrative PersonnelDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsEuropeHealth PolicyHumansPrimary Health CareState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32337283
PMCPMC7168691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.