Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337245›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Discovery of Urinary Proteomic Signature for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.

Yinghua Zhao, Lianying Yang, Changqing Sun, Yang Li, Yangzhige He, Li Zhang, Tieliu Shi, Guangshun Wang, Xuebo Men, Wei Sun and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinghua ZhaoSchool of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Lianying YangJoint Center for Translational Medicine, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin 301800, China.
Changqing SunJoint Center for Translational Medicine, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin 301800, China.
Yang LiState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yangzhige HeCentral Research Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100110, China.
Li ZhangCenter for Bioinformatics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Tieliu ShiCenter for Bioinformatics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.
Guangshun WangJoint Center for Translational Medicine, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin 301800, China.
Xuebo MenJoint Center for Translational Medicine, Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Tianjin 301800, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-4038
Wei SunState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-0596
Fuchu HeState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1094-4019
Jun QinState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1188-932X
Tianjin Hospital · CNBeijing Proteome Research Center · CNEast China Normal University · CNBaylor College of Medicine · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdomens, but the confident preoperative diagnosis is still a challenge. In order to profile noninvasive urinary biomarkers that could discriminate acute appendicitis from other acute abdomens, we carried out mass spectrometric experiments on urine samples from patients with different acute abdomens and evaluated diagnostic potential of urinary proteins with various machine-learning models. Firstly, outlier protein pools of acute appendicitis and controls were constructed using the discovery dataset (32 acute appendicitis and 41 control acute abdomens) against a reference set of 495 normal urine samples. Ten outlier proteins were then selected by feature selection algorithm and were applied in construction of machine-learning models using naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms. The models were assessed in the discovery dataset by leave-one-out cross validation and were verified in the validation dataset (16 acute appendicitis and 45 control acute abdomens). Among the three models, random forest model achieved the best performance: the accuracy was 84.9% in the leave-one-out cross validation of discovery dataset and 83.6% (sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 84.4%) in the validation dataset. In conclusion, we developed a 10-protein diagnostic panel by the random forest model that was able to distinguish acute appendicitis from confusable acute abdomens with high specificity, which indicated the clinical application potential of noninvasive urinary markers in disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialProteomicsAbdomen, AcuteAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAppendicitisBayes TheoremBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansMachine LearningBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32337245
PMCPMC7165319
OpenAlexW3015775974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.