ReviewERJ open research2020
Cough-provocation tests with hypertonic aerosols.
Review in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Ethyl Butyrate-Induced Cough Before and After Breath Control Techniques in Healthy Adults.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Trial
- Association between cold spells and chronic lung disease: a nationwide spatial machine learning analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Airway response to mannitol among healthy subjects.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Patient-reported assessments of chronic cough in clinical trials: accessory or primary endpoints?Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Is fractional exhaled nitric oxide a treatable trait in chronic cough: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Cross-country skiers often experience respiratory symptoms during and after exercise but have a low prevalence of prolonged cough.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of mental health and personality traits on the incidence of chronic cough in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Utility of Cough Provocation Tests in Chronic Cough and Respiratory Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and Introduction of New Reference Ranges for the Capsaicin Test.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2021Review
- Differential features of chronic cough according to etiology and the simple decision tree for predicting causes.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Similarities and differences between the cough suppression test and the cough challenge test.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in cough research suggest a more widespread use of cough-provocation tests to demonstrate the hypersensitivity of the cough reflex arc. Cough-provocation tests with capsaicin or acidic aerosols have been used for decades in scientific studies. Several factors have hindered their use in everyday clinical work:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.