Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337094›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2020

Dual EGFR blockade with cetuximab and erlotinib combined with anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab in advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 dose escalation triplet combination trial.

Vivek Subbiah, Ecaterina Ileana Dumbrava, Yunfang Jiang, Kyaw Z Thein, Aung Naing, David S Hong, Siqing Fu, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Filip Janku and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Research progress on the mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab targeted therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Targeting Akt in cancer for precision therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Inhibition ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vivek Subbiah *1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6064-6837
Ecaterina Ileana Dumbrava *1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Yunfang Jiang1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Kyaw Z Thein1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Aung Naing1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
David S Hong1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Siqing Fu1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Sarina A Piha-Paul1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Apostolia M Tsimberidou1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Filip Janku1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Funda Meric-Bernstam1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Razelle Kurzrock *2Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA USA.
Gerald Falchook *3Sarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, CO USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSarah Cannon Research Institute · GBUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngiogenesis and activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) pathway play an essential role in tumor proliferation and metastasis. Targeting angiogenesis or EGFR alone does not yield adequate tumor control in most solid tumors. Overcoming intrinsic and/or acquired resistance may need a doublet or triplet therapy strategy. Herein, we report the safety and feasibility of dual EGFR blockade with EGFR monoclonal antibody and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor combined with anti-VEGF antibody in advanced solid tumors.

methodsWe conducted a phase I study combining erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab. Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors (excluding colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers) were analyzed for safety, toxicity profile, and response. Anti-tumor activity was evaluated per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.0).

resultsThirty-six patients received treatment on a range of dose-levels. The most frequent tumor types enrolled were cervical (n = 10), head and neck squamous cell (n = 10), and follicular thyroid (n = 4) cancers. The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 2 adverse events were rash (56%), hypomagnesemia (17%), pruritus (11%), diarrhea (8%), and tumor-related bleeding (8%). Seventeen of 19 patients (89%) treated at the maximum tolerated dose did not present treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity. Fifteen (63%) of the 24 evaluable patients achieved a disease control (stable disease ≥ 4 months (n = 14) and partial response (n = 1). The median number of prior lines of therapies was 3 (range 1-10).

conclusionsThe triplet combination of erlotinib, cetuximab, and bevacizumab was well tolerated, conferring clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients. Future studies are warranted with second or third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase triplet combinations in the EGFR pathway aberrant patients.

Indexed as

Advanced solid tumorsCetuximab, erlotinib and bevacizumabDual EGFR blockadePhase 1 dose escalation

Identifiers

PMID32337094
PMCPMC7171918
OpenAlexW3020459586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.