Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337083›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2020

The impact of gender equity in agriculture on nutritional status, diets, and household food security: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Helen Harris-Fry, Hayaan Nur, Bhavani Shankar, Giacomo Zanello, Chittur Srinivasan, Suneetha Kadiyala

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-908X
Hayaan NurDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Bhavani ShankarCentre for Development, Environment and Policy, SOAS University of London, London, UK.
Giacomo ZanelloSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading - Whiteknights Campus, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Chittur SrinivasanSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading - Whiteknights Campus, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Suneetha KadiyalaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 210894/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Undernutrition rates remain high in rural, low-income settings, where large, gender-based inequities persist. We hypothesised that increasing gender equity in agriculture could improve nutrition. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to assess the associations between gender-based inequities (in income, land, livestock, and workloads) and nutrition, diets and food security outcomes in agricultural contexts of low-income and middle-income countries. Between 9 March and 7 August 2018, we searched 18 databases and 14 journals, and contacted 27 experts. We included quantitative and qualitative literature from agricultural contexts in low-income and middle-income countries, with no date restriction. Outcomes were women's and children's anthropometric status, dietary quality and household food security. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. Results: We identified 19 820 records, of which 34 studies (42 809 households) met the inclusion criteria. Most (22/25) quantitative studies had a high risk of bias, and qualitative evidence was of mixed quality. Income, land and livestock equity had heterogeneous associations with household food security and child anthropometric outcomes. Meta-analyses showed women's share of household income earned (0.32, 95% CI -4.22 to 4.86; six results) and women's share of land owned (2.72, 95% CI -0.52 to 5.96; three results) did not increase the percentage of household budget spent on food. Higher-quality studies showed more consistently positive associations between income equity and food security. Evidence is limited on other exposure-outcome pairings. Conclusions: We find heterogeneous associations between gender equity and household-level food security. High-quality research is needed to establish the impact of gender equity on nutrition outcomes across contexts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018093987.

Indexed as

Food SupplyNutritional StatusAgricultureChildDietFemaleFood SecurityGender EquityHumanschild healthmaternal healthnutritionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32337083
PMCPMC7170429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.