Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337061›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2019

Primary labral reconstruction in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, irreparable labral tears and severe acetabular chondral defects decreases the risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty: a pair-matched study.

David R Maldonado, Cammille C Go, Joseph R Laseter, Ajay C Lall, Michael R Kopscik, Benjamin G Domb

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction: a review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David R MaldonadoAmerican Hip Institute, 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cammille C GoAmerican Hip Institute, 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joseph R LaseterAmerican Hip Institute, 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ajay C LallAmerican Hip Institute, 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael R KopscikMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Benjamin G DombAmerican Hip Institute, 999 E Touhy Ave, Suite 450, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-8647
American Hip Institute · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the presence of severe acetabular cartilage defects, the benefits of labral reconstruction (RECON) versus labral resection (RESEC) have not been determined. Prospectively collected data between October 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were hip arthroscopy, acetabular Outerbridge grade III/IV, irreparable labral tears that underwent RECON or RESEC, and minimum 2-year postoperative measures for the modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, International Hip Outcome Tool, Patient Satisfaction and Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Exclusion criteria included Tönnis grade >1, previous hip conditions or previous ipsilateral hip surgeries. A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed based on age ±5 years, sex, body mass index ±5 kg/m

Identifiers

PMID32337061
PMCPMC7171804
OpenAlexW2964282652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.