ReviewMobile DNA2020
Diverse transposable element landscapes in pathogenic and nonpathogenic yeast models: the value of a comparative perspective.
Review in Mobile DNA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dynamics of transposable element content in the genome of the human pathogen Histoplasma.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2026Article
- Article
- Elimination of virus-like particles reduces protein aggregation and extends replicative lifespan inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A high-quality reference genome for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces osmophilus.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Genome-wide analysis of heat stress-stimulated transposon mobility in the human fungal pathogenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Identification of an integrase-independent pathway of retrotransposition.Science advances · 2022Article
- Structured Framework and Genome Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The origin of RNA interference: Adaptive or neutral evolution?PLoS biology · 2022Article
- A nuclear pore sub-complex restricts the propagation of Ty retrotransposons by limiting their transcription.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- The Dynamism of Transposon Methylation for Plant Development and Stress Adaptation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Transposable Elements Contribute to Genome Dynamics and Gene Expression Variation in the Fungal Plant Pathogen Verticillium dahliae.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Hijacking Transposable Elements for Saturation Mutagenesis in Fungi.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomics and other large-scale analyses have drawn increasing attention to the potential impacts of transposable elements (TEs) on their host genomes. However, it remains challenging to transition from identifying potential roles to clearly demonstrating the level of impact TEs have on genome evolution and possible functions that they contribute to their host organisms. I summarize TE content and distribution in four well-characterized yeast model systems in this review: the pathogens
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.