Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336990›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2020

The hidden risk of ionizing radiation in the operating room: a survey among 258 orthopaedic surgeons in Brazil.

Robinson Esteves Pires, Igor Guedes Nogueira Reis, Ângelo Ribeiro Vaz de Faria, Vincenzo Giordano, Pedro José Labronici, William Dias Belangero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A tension system for angular correction of bent intramedullary nails: in vitro analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robinson Esteves Pires1Departamento do Aparelho Locomotor, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190, Santa Efegênia, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.
Igor Guedes Nogueira Reis1Departamento do Aparelho Locomotor, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190, Santa Efegênia, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.
Ângelo Ribeiro Vaz de Faria1Departamento do Aparelho Locomotor, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190, Santa Efegênia, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.
Vincenzo GiordanoServiço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia Prof. Nova Monteiro, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Pedro José Labronici3Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ Brazil.
William Dias Belangero4Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital Geral de Bonsucesso · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess orthopaedic surgeon knowledge in Brazil about ionizing radiation and its health implications on surgical teams and patients.

methodsA 15-question survey on theoretical and practical concepts of ionizing radiation was administered during the 23rd Brazilian Orthopaedic Trauma Association annual meeting. The survey addressed issues within orthopedic surgery, such as radiation safety concepts, protection, exposure, as well as the participant gender. Participants were either orthopedic surgeons or orthopedic surgery residents working at institutions in Brazil.

resultsOne thousand surveys were distributed at the moment of the meeting registration, and 258 were answered completely (25.8% response rate). Only 5.8% of participants used basic radiation protection equipment; 47.3% used a dosimeter; 2.7% reached the annual maximum permissible radiation dose; 10.5% knew the period of increased risk to fetal gestation; 5.8% knew the maximum permissible radiation dose during pregnancy; 58.5% knew that the hands, eyes, and thyroid are the most exposed areas and at greater risk of radiation-related lesions; 25.2% knew the safe distance from a radiation-emitting tube is 3 m or more; 44.2% knew the safest positioning of the radiation-emitting tube; 25.2% knew that smaller tubes emit greater radiation at the entrance dose to magnify the image; and 55.4% knew that the surgery team receives more scattered radiation in surgical procedures performed on obese patients.

conclusionThis study revealed inadequate theoretical and practical knowledge about radiation exposure among orthopaedic surgeons in Brazil. Only a minority of orthopaedic surgeons used basic radiation protection equipment. No significant differences in knowledge were found when comparing all orthopedic surgery specialties. Our findings indicate an urgent need for education to increase knowledge among orthopaedic surgeons about the hazards of ionizing radiation. Personal protection and implementation of the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) protocol in daily practice are important behaviors to prevent the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

Ionizing radiationOccupational exposureOrthopaedic surgeonOrthopedicsRadiationRadiation exposureRadiation protectionScatter radiation

Identifiers

PMID32336990
PMCPMC7175580
OpenAlexW3018602542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.