Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336880›Full record

ReviewTrends in food science & technology2011

Novel and established intestinal cell line models - An indispensable tool in food science and nutrition.

Tomaz Langerholc, Petros A Maragkoudakis, Jan Wollgast, Lidija Gradisnik, Avrelija Cencic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in food science & technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  12. Utilizing the apical-out enteroidsFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Antioxidant Activity of Different Hop (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomaz LangerholcDep. of Microbiology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoce, Slovenia.
Petros A MaragkoudakisEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.
Jan WollgastEuropean Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.
Lidija GradisnikDep. of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Slomskov trg 15, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Avrelija CencicDep. of Microbiology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, University of Maribor, Pivola 10, 2311 Hoce, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents the applications of intestinal cell models of human and pig origin in food and nutritional sciences and highlights their potential as

Identifiers

PMID32336880
PMCPMC7172287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.