Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336586›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of emergency medicine2020

Pharmacotherapy in COVID-19; A narrative review for emergency providers.

Nikita Mehta, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Nour Alkindi, Ali Pourmand

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Tale of Two Proteases: MPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikita MehtaEmergency Medicine Department, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Maryann Mazer-AmirshahiEmergency Medicine Department, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Nour AlkindiEmergency Medicine Department, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Ali PourmandEmergency Medicine Department, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: pourmand@gwu.edu.
George Washington University · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has been particularly challenging due to a lack of established therapies and treatment guidelines. With the rapid transmission of disease, even the off-label use of available therapies has been impeded by limited availability. Several antivirals, antimalarials, and biologics are being considered for treatment at this time. The purpose of this literature review is to synthesize the available information regarding treatment options for COVID-19 and serve as a resource for health care professionals.

objectivesThis narrative review was conducted to summarize the effectiveness of current therapy options for COVID-19 and address the controversial use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). PubMed and SCOPUS were queried using a combination of the keywords "COVID 19," "SARS-CoV-2," and "treatment." All types of studies were evaluated including systematic reviews, case-studies, and clinical guidelines. DISCUSSION: There are currently no therapeutic drugs available that are directly active against SARS-CoV-2; however, several antivirals (remdesivir, favipiravir) and antimalarials (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine) have emerged as potential therapies. Current guidelines recommend combination treatment with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin or chloroquine, if hydroxychloroquine is unavailable, in patients with moderate disease, although these recommendations are based on limited evidence. Remdesivir and convalescent plasma may be considered in critical patients with respiratory failure; however, access to these therapies may be limited. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonists may be used in patients who develop evidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Corticosteroids should be avoided unless there is evidence of refractory septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or another compelling indication for their use. ACE inhibitors and ARBs should not be discontinued at this time and ibuprofen may be used for fever.

conclusionThere are several ongoing clinical trials that are testing the efficacy of single and combination treatments with the drugs mentioned in this review and new agents are under development. Until the results of these trials become available, we must use the best available evidence for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Additionally, we can learn from the experiences of healthcare providers around the world to combat this pandemic.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAdrenal Cortex HormonesAlanineAmidesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Drug Therapy, CombinationEmergency Service, HospitalHumansHydroxychloroquineInterleukin-6Interleukin-6 InhibitorsPandemicsAdenosine MonophosphateAdrenal Cortex HormonesAlanineAmidesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntiviral AgentsfavipiravirHydroxychloroquineIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Interleukin-6 InhibitorsPyrazinesremdesivirCOVID 19FavipiravirHydroxychloroquineRemdesivirSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32336586
PMCPMC7158837
OpenAlexW3017138221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.