Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336578›Full record

ArticleContact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association2020

Could telehealth help eye care practitioners adapt contact lens services during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Manbir Nagra, Marta Vianya-Estopa, James S Wolffsohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The impact of COVID-19 on soft contact lens wear in established European and US markets.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A prospective evaluation of the clinical safety and effectiveness of a COVID-19 Urgent Eyecare Service across five areas in England.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on working practices of UK primary care optometrists.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Orthoptic Services in the UK and Ireland During the COVID-19 Pandemic.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manbir NagraVision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: nagra.manbirk@gmail.com.
Marta Vianya-EstopaVision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
James S WolffsohnOphthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated government-imposed restrictions on social interactions and travel. For many, the guidance has led to new ways of working, most notably a shift towards working remotely. While eye care practitioners (ECPs) may continue to provide urgent or emergency eye care, in many cases the travel restrictions present a unique challenge by preventing conventional face-to-face examination. Telephone triage provides a useful starting point for establishing at-risk and emergency patients; but patient examination is central to contact lens patient care. The indeterminate period over which conventional practice will be suspended, and the risk that resumption of 'normal' practice could be impeded by a potential secondary peak in COVID-19 cases, hastens the need for practitioners to adapt their delivery of eyecare. Specifically, it is prudent to reflect upon supportive evidence for more comprehensive approaches to teleoptometry in contact lens practice. Smartphone based ocular imaging is an area which has seen considerable growth, particularly for imaging the posterior eye. Smartphone imaging of the anterior eye requires additional specialised instrumentation unlikely to be available to patients at home. Further, there is only limited evidence for self-administered image capture. In general, digital photographs, are useful for detection of gross anterior eye changes, but subtle changes are less discernible. For the assessment of visual acuity, many electronic test charts have been validated for use by practitioners. Research into self-administered visual acuity measures remains limited. The absence of a comprehensive evidence base for teleoptometry limits ECPs, particularly during this pandemic. Knowledge gaps ought to be addressed to facilitate development of optometry specific evidence-based guidance for telecare. In particular, advances in ocular self-imaging could help move this field forwards.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusPandemicsContact LensesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross InfectionDisease Transmission, InfectiousHealth Services ResearchHumansInfection ControlMonitoring, AmbulatoryOptometryPatient CarePneumonia, ViralProfessional PracticeSARS-CoV-2Anterior eye segmentContact lensesCOVID-19Evidence based healthcareTelehealthTeleoptometry

Identifiers

PMID32336578
PMCPMC7165279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.