ReviewSystematic reviews2020
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.
Review in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality improvement interventions in surgical oncology: systematic review of international studies.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
- Sustainability management control in healthcare organizations - current state and future directions.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Factors influencing patient safety incident reporting in African healthcare organisations: a systematic integrative review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Strategies to improve care for older adults who present to the emergency department: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- 2021 EULAR recommendations for the implementation of self-management strategies in patients with inflammatory arthritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2021Guideline
- Care programs and their components for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.Respiratory research · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Organizational contextual factors that predict success of a quality improvement collaborative approach to enhance integrated HIV-tuberculosis services: a sub-study of the Scaling up TB/HIV Integration trial.Implementation science : IS · 2021Trial
- Fostering Locally Led Palliative Care Innovation: A Qualitative Evaluation of the SPHERE-Stanford Collaborative Quality Improvement Program.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Policy Analysis of Healthcare Healthy Eating Policies in Canada.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Review
- Health facilities as a lever for birth registration in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.Health policy and planning · 2026Review
- Implementation of a Self-Help Swallowing Exercise Program in Head and Neck Cancer.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026Article
- Work Allocation Justice in Saudi Nursing: A Qualitative Exploration of Equity, Fairness Perceptions, and Organizational Factors Influencing Nurse Burnout and Quality of Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reducing surgical site infections in paediatric cardiac surgery in a resource-constrained setting: a quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Developing quality improvement awareness, skills, and emerging leadership behaviors through clinical audits in postgraduate medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Implementation Fidelity of the Transitional Care Model: A Mixed Methods Study.Global implementation research and applications · 2026Article
- Antimicrobials for neonates: evaluation and prescribing practices in Australian neonatal units.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Contextual Factors Affecting Evidence-Based Practice in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Adapting and Co-Producing a Psychological First Aid Intervention for Care Home Staff: A Person-Based Approach to Enhance Workforce Resilience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecognising the influence of context and the context-sensitive nature of quality improvement (QI) interventions is crucial to implementing effective improvements and successfully replicating them in new settings, yet context is still poorly understood. To address this challenge, it is necessary to capture generalisable knowledge, first to understand which aspects of context are most important to QI and why, and secondly, to explore how these factors can be managed to support healthcare improvement, in terms of implementing successful improvement initiatives, achieving sustainability and scaling interventions. The research question was how and why does context influence quality improvement initiatives in healthcare?
methodsA realist review explored the contextual conditions that influence healthcare improvement. Realist methodology integrates theoretical understanding and stakeholder input with empirical research findings. The review aimed to identify and understand the role of context during the improvement cycle, i.e. planning, implementation, sustainability and transferability; and distil new knowledge to inform the design and development of context-sensitive QI initiatives. We developed a preliminary theory of the influence of context to arrive at a conceptual and theoretical framework.
resultsThirty-five studies were included in the review, demonstrating the interaction of key contextual factors across healthcare system levels during the improvement cycle. An evidence-based explanatory theoretical model is proposed to illustrate the interaction between contextual factors, system levels (macro, meso, micro) and the stages of the improvement journey. Findings indicate that the consideration of these contextual factors would enhance the design and delivery of improvement initiatives, across a range of improvement settings.
conclusionsThis is the first realist review of context in QI and contributes to a deeper understanding of how context influences quality improvement initiatives. The distillation of key contextual factors offers the potential to inform the design and development of context-sensitive interventions to enhance improvement initiatives and address the challenge of spread and sustainability. Future research should explore the application of our conceptual model to enhance improvement-planning processes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017062135.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.