Observational studyBMC health services research2020
Nudging New York: adaptive models and the limits of behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows and health inequalities.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preventative behavioural interventions that reduce health inequities: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Behavioural economic interventions to reduce health care appointment non-attendance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Nudge Theory in Improving the Oral Self-Care of Schoolchildren with Refugee and Immigrant Backgrounds in Mashhad, Iran.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Understanding the causes of missingness in primary care: a realist review.BMC medicine · 2024Review
- Field testing the transferability of behavioural science knowledge on promoting vaccinations.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Telehealth delivery of physical therapist-led interventions for persons with chronic low back pain in underserved communities: lessons from pragmatic clinical trials.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Distance Matters: Investigating No-Shows in a Large Rural Provider Network.Clinical medicine & research · 2023Article
- Application of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Develop and Validate a Prediction Model for Ambulatory Non-Arrivals.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- The persistence of cognitive biases in financial decisions across economic groups.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Predicting no-show appointments in a pediatric hospital in Chile using machine learning.Health care management science · 2023Article
- Primary Care Appointment Completion Rates and Telemedicine Utilization Among Black and Non-Black Patients from 2019 to 2020.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022Article
- The Impact of Telehealth Adoption During COVID-19 Pandemic on Patterns of Pediatric Subspecialty Care Utilization.Academic pediatricsArticle
- From Detroit to Kansas City: Adapting the WE CARE Model to Improve Maternal and Infant Health.Health equityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMissed healthcare appointments (no-shows) are costly and operationally inefficient for health systems. No-show rates are particularly high for vulnerable populations, even though these populations often require additional care. Few studies on no-show behavior or potential interventions exist specifically for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which care for over 24 million disadvantaged individuals in the United States. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of no-show behavior and to analyze the effects of a reminder intervention in urban FQHCs in order to design effective policy solutions to a protracted issue in healthcare.
methodsThis is a retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data from 11 facilities belonging to a New York City-based FQHC network between June 2017 to April 2018. This data includes 53,149 visits for 41,495 unique patients. Seven hierarchical generalized linear models and generalized additive models were used to predict no-shows, and multiple regression models evaluated the effectiveness of a reminder. All analyses were conducted in R.
resultsThe strongest predictor of no-show rates in FQHCs is whether or not patients are assigned to empaneled providers (z = - 91.45, p < 10
conclusionsThe limited effects of the reminder intervention suggest the need for more personalized behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows. We recommend that these begin with increasing the use of empaneled providers for preventive care appointments and reducing the lag time between setting the appointment and the actual date of the appointment, at least for individuals with a high rate of no-show. By complementing these with low-intensity, low-cost behavioral interventions, we would expect greater impacts for improved access to care, contributing to the well-being of vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.