ArticleBMC family practice2020
Views of patients with multi-morbidity on what is important for patient-centered care in the primary care setting.
Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access or continuity: a zero sum game? A systematic review of the literature examining the relationship between access and continuity in primary healthcare.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Listening to the Patient's Voice: A Quantitative Study on Patient-Centredness in Diabetes Care in Palestinian Public Primary Care Services.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "How old do you feel?" Subjective age as a tool to enhance communication in primary care: a pilot observational study.BMC primary care · 2025Observational
- Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of patient-centred care interventions among general practitioners: a systematic review protocol.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania.The open nursing journal · 2025Article
- Information usefulness of public disclosure in Taiwan: Does it vary across specific diseases/conditions and contexts?PloS one · 2025Article
- Patient-centered care in diabetes care-concepts, relationships and practice.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Investigating the impact of primary care networks on continuity of care in English general practice: Analysis of interviews with patients and clinicians from a mixed methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences of medication management while navigating ongoing care between outpatient services: A qualitative case study of patients on hemodialysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Living with Multimorbidity through Time: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Longitudinal Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Perceptions of family medicine among long-term patients of a family medicine clinic in Japan: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Delineating and clarifying the concept of self-care monitoring: a concept analysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Review
- Self-care management and experiences of using telemonitoring as support when living with hypertension or heart failure: A descriptive qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Article
- Is a bio-psychosocial approach model possible at the first level of health services in the Democratic Republic of Congo? An organizational analysis of six health centers in South Kivu.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- People-centred primary health care: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Validation of the Korean Version of Patient-Centered Care Tool: For Outpatients.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Views of patients with obesity on person-centred care: A Q-methodology study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Design and Development of an eHealth Service for Collaborative Self-Management among Older Adults with Chronic Diseases: A Theory-Driven User-Centered Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Easier Said Than Done: Healthcare Professionals' Barriers to the Provision of Patient-Centered Primary Care to Patients with Multimorbidity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Making care more patient centered; experiences of healthcare professionals and patients with multimorbidity in the primary care setting.BMC family practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-centered care (PCC) has been proposed as the way forward in improving primary care for patients with multi-morbidity. However, it is not clear what PCC exactly looks like in practice for patients with multi-morbidity. A better understanding of multi-morbid patients' views on what PCC should look like and which elements are most important may help to improve care delivery for this vulnerable population. The present study thus aimed to identify views of patients with multi-morbidity on the relative importance of PCC aspects in a Dutch primary care setting.
methodsInterviews were conducted with 16 patients with multi-morbidity using Q-methodology, which combines quantitative and qualitative analyses. The participants ranked 28 statements about the eight dimensions of PCC (patients' preferences, information and education, access to care, emotional support, family and friends, continuity and transition, physical comfort, and coordination of care) by relative importance. By-person factor analysis using centroid factor extraction and varimax rotation were used to reveal factors that represent viewpoints. Qualitative interview data were used to interpret the viewpoints.
resultsThe analyses revealed three factors representing three distinct viewpoints of patients with multi-morbidity on what is important for patient-centered care in the primary care setting. Patients with viewpoint 1 are prepared proactive patients who seem to be well-off and want to be in charge of their own care. To do so, they seek medical information and prefer to be supported by a strongly coordinated multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. Patients with viewpoint 2 are everyday patients who visit GPs and require well-coordinated, respectful, and supportive care. Patients with viewpoint 3 are vulnerable patients who are less resourceful in terms of communication skills and finances, and thus require accessible care and professionals taking the lead while treating them with dignity and respect.
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that not all patients with multi-morbidity require the same type of care delivery, and that not all aspects of PCC delivery are equally important to all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.