Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336009›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2020

Deciphering MET-dependent modulation of global cellular responses to DNA damage by quantitative phosphoproteomics.

Ariel Bensimon, Jonas P Koch, Paola Francica, Selina M Roth, Rahel Riedo, Astrid A Glück, Eleonora Orlando, Andree Blaukat, Daniel M Aebersold, Yitzhak Zimmer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cancer Cells Haploinsufficient for ATM Are Sensitized to PARP Inhibitors byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariel BensimonDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-6987
Jonas P KochDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Paola FrancicaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Selina M RothDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Rahel RiedoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Astrid A GlückDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Eleonora OrlandoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Andree BlaukatGlobal Research & Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Yitzhak ZimmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Ruedi AebersoldDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Michaela MedováDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-469X
University of Bern · CHETH Zurich · CHMerck (Germany) · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that interference with growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling can affect DNA damage response (DDR) networks, with a consequent impact on cellular responses to DNA-damaging agents widely used in cancer treatment. In that respect, the MET RTK is deregulated in abundance and/or activity in a variety of human tumors. Using two proteomic techniques, we explored how disrupting MET signaling modulates global cellular phosphorylation response to ionizing radiation (IR). Following an immunoaffinity-based phosphoproteomic discovery survey, we selected candidate phosphorylation sites for extensive characterization by targeted proteomics focusing on phosphorylation sites in both signaling networks. Several substrates of the DDR were confirmed to be modulated by sequential MET inhibition and IR, or MET inhibition alone. Upon combined treatment, for two substrates, NUMA1 S395 and CHEK1 S345, the gain and loss of phosphorylation, respectively, were recapitulated using invivo tumor models by immunohistochemistry, with possible utility in future translational research. Overall, we have corroborated phosphorylation sites at the intersection between MET and the DDR signaling networks, and suggest that these represent a class of proteins at the interface between oncogene-driven proliferation and genomic stability.

Indexed as

DNA DamageProteomicsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDNA RepairDown-RegulationEpitheliumFemaleHumansMesodermMiceNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationRadiation, IonizingNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoproteinsATMDNA damage responseionizing radiationmass spectrometryMETreceptor tyrosine kinase

Identifiers

PMID32336009
PMCPMC7266272
OpenAlexW3018803359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.