Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32335989›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Assessing and Addressing the Need for Cancer Patient Education in a Resource-Limited Setting in Haiti.

Lauren E Schleimer, Peter-Gens Desameau, Ruth Damuse, Maia Olsen, Veronica Manzo, Carlos Cardenas, Hedieh Mehrtash, Eric L Krakauer, Leo Masamba, Catharine Wang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren E SchleimerColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-6694
Peter-Gens DesameauHôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais, Mirebalais, Haiti.
Ruth DamuseHôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais, Mirebalais, Haiti.
Maia OlsenPartners in Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Veronica ManzoGlobal Oncology, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Carlos CardenasThe MEME Design, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Hedieh MehrtashGlobal Oncology, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric L KrakauerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leo MasambaQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.
Catharine WangBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ami S BhattGlobal Oncology, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Lawrence N ShulmanAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Franklin W HuangGlobal Oncology, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Partners In Health · USBoston University · USCenter for Innovation · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital · MWStanford University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMisinformation and lack of information about cancer and its treatment pose significant challenges to delivering cancer care in resource-limited settings and may undermine patient engagement in care. We aimed to investigate patients' knowledge and attitudes toward cancer and its treatment and to adapt, implement, and evaluate a low-literacy cancer patient education booklet at the Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM) in rural Haiti. MATERIALS AND

methodsA low-literacy cancer patient education booklet was adapted into Haitian Creole in collaboration with clinicians at HUM. Patients were recruited for structured interviews (n = 20) and two focus groups (n = 13) designed to explore patients' attitudes toward cancer and its treatment and to assess whether the booklet increased patients' knowledge via an investigator-designed knowledge test.

resultsParticipants reported a subjective lack of knowledge about cancer and its treatments and described views of cancer as deadly or incurable. Patients of varying education levels valued receiving written materials that set expectations about cancer treatment and expressed a desire to share the booklet with caregivers and others in their community. Participants across all levels of education significantly increased their performance on a knowledge test after counseling using the booklet (p < .001).

conclusionWe found that an educational booklet about cancer developed in collaboration with local providers was well received by patients with variable literacy levels and improved their knowledge of cancer and its treatment in a resource-limited setting. Such educational materials have the potential to serve as tools to engage patients with cancer and their families in care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Misinformation and lack of information pose significant challenges to delivering cancer care in resource-limited settings; however, there are often no culturally and literacy appropriate tools available to aid in patient education. This article shows that written educational materials are well received by patients of variable literacy levels and can be effective tools for increasing patients' knowledge of cancer and its treatment in a limited-resource setting. Furthermore, the authors have made their educational booklet, Cancer and You, freely available online and welcome the opportunity to connect with readers of The Oncologist interested in implementing this educational booklet in clinical care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicCaregiversHaitiHealth EducationHumansCancerGlobal oncologyHaitiPatient education

Identifiers

PMID32335989
PMCPMC7938404
OpenAlexW3019608705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.