Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32335977›Full record

ReviewCancer science2020

Mdm2: Open questions.

Matthias Dobbelstein, Arnold J Levine

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TWIST1 bridges p53 and MDM2 and impairs the efficacy of MDM2 inhibitors.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeting the deubiquitinaseOncology reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias DobbelsteinInstitute of Molecular Oncology, Göttingen Center of Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5052-3967
Arnold J LevineInstitute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Institute for Advanced Study · USUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Scientific ReagentsP01CA087497 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PRIVES, CAROL · 2000 to 2021
$35.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mdm2 oncoprotein and its association with p53 were discovered 30 years ago, and a cornucopia of activities and regulatory pathways have been associated with it. In this review, we will raise questions about Mdm2 and its cousin Mdm4 that we consider worth pursuing in future research, reaching from molecular structures and intracellular activities all the way to development, evolution, and cancer therapy. We anticipate that such research will not only close a few gaps in our knowledge but could add new dimensions to our current view. This compilation of questions contributes to the preparation for the 10th Mdm2 Workshop in Tokyo.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBiological EvolutionBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsCell Transformation, NeoplasticGene Expression RegulationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMultigene FamilyMutationProtein BindingProtein TransportProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Signal TransductionBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsMDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Hdm2Mdm2Mdm4MdmXp53

Identifiers

PMID32335977
PMCPMC7385351
OpenAlexW3017611316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.