Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32335976›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Electronic cigarettes, nicotine use trends and use initiation ages among US adolescents from 1999 to 2018.

Floe Foxon, Arielle S Selya

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Australia Smoking and Vaping Model: The Potential Impact of Increasing Access to Nicotine Vaping Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Floe FoxonSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-9178
Arielle S SelyaBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7026-6988
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary approaches to American Indian and rural population health researchP20GM121341 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI ANGAL, JYOTI · 2017 to 2022
$11.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsRecent nicotine use trends raise concerns that electronic cigarettes (ECs) may act as a gateway to cigarettes among adolescents. The aims of this study were to examine prevalence trends of exclusive EC use, exclusive cigarette use and dual use to determine the corresponding ages of initiation and to investigate hypothetical trends in total nicotine use and cigarette use in the absence of ECs among US adolescents.

designObservational study using data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) to statistically model trends in the prevalences of each user group and their initiation ages. Projections from counterfactual models based on data from 1999 to 2009 (before EC introduction) were compared with actual trends based on data from 1999 to 2018. Rigorous error analyses were applied, including Theil proportions.

settingUSA. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Adolescents aged 12-17 years who were established exclusive cigarette users (≥ 100 cigarettes smoked and ≤ 100 days vaped), established exclusive EC users (< 100 cigarettes smoked and > 100 days vaped) and established dual users (≥ 100 cigarettes smoked and > 100 days vaped), based on cumulative life-time exposure (n ≈ 12 500-31 000 per wave).

findingsExclusive cigarette use prevalence declined from 1999 to 2018, while exclusive EC use and dual use prevalences increased since their introduction in 2009. The age of cigarette initiation began a slight increase after 2014, whereas the age for EC use remained approximately constant and was higher than that of cigarettes. The counterfactual comparison results were consistent with ECs not increasing the number of US adolescent nicotine users, and in fact diverting adolescents from cigarettes.

conclusionsElectronic cigarettes may have offset conventional smoking among US adolescents between 2010 and 2018 by maintaining the total nicotine use prevalence and diverting them from more harmful conventional smoking. Additionally, electronic cigarette users appear to initiate at older ages relative to conventional smokers, which is associated with lower risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsChildCigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleNicotinePrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsUnited StatesVapingNicotineAdolescentscigarettesdiversionelectronic cigarettesgatewaynicotine

Identifiers

PMID32335976
PMCPMC7606254
OpenAlexW3018146885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.