ReviewClinical rheumatology2021
Rheumatology care of migrants from sub-Saharan Africa: a literature review and qualitative pilot study of patients' perspectives.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The outlook of rheumatological care in Africa: Current state, challenges, and recommendation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRheumatologists practising in the UK National Health Service (NHS) are likely to treat migrant patients from sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to conduct a literature review about rheumatoid arthritis prevalence in Africa and understand the experiences of patients with rheumatological conditions, about their past healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa and their transition of care to the United Kingdom (UK).
methodsA systematic search and a pilot study using semi-structured interviews to gain the views of migrants from sub-Saharan Africa with rheumatological conditions was conducted.
resultsThirty-two studies reported on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Africa. Studies were small and out-of-date, and there was significant heterogeneity in prevalence rates. For the qualitative study, seven participants were recruited. Four themes were highlighted: (i) the physical and emotional impact of rheumatological conditions on participants; (ii) limited rheumatology care in sub-Saharan Africa with high costs, limited access to specialists, lack of investigations and treatments, the use of traditional medicines and poor communication by clinicians; (iii) barriers to rheumatology care in the UK such as migrants' poor understanding of rheumatological conditions and NHS entitlements; (iv) and ways to improve access to care such as patient, public and general practitioner education.
conclusionThis study has highlighted the paucity of rheumatoid arthritis prevalence data in Africa and described, for the first time, the migrant's perspective of rheumatology care in sub-Saharan Africa and the transition of care to the UK. This description begins to allow healthcare providers in the UK to tailor management for this migrant population. Key Points • Rheumatological conditions are common in Africa, but there is a paucity of epidemiological data regarding the prevalence of specific conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. • UK clinicians need to be mindful when treating migrants that access to rheumatologists and specialist investigations and treatment is limited in sub-Saharan Africa and that there is often limited public and patient understanding of rheumatological conditions. • Migrants continue to lack understanding of their NHS entitlements and fear data sharing with immigration services which can be a barrier to seeking care. • This study has exposed the lack of understanding about rheumatological conditions by the public and some general practitioners which needs to be addressed with effective education and awareness campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.