Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32335433›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2020

Maternal occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the risk of isolated congenital heart defects among offspring.

Jenil Patel, Wendy N Nembhard, Maria D Politis, Carissa M Rocheleau, Peter H Langlois, Gary M Shaw, Paul A Romitti, Suzanne M Gilboa, Tania A Desrosiers, Tabassum Insaf and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Environmental Signals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jenil PatelDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. Electronic address: jpatel2@uams.edu.
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Maria D PolitisDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Carissa M RocheleauNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Peter H LangloisBirth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA.
Gary M ShawDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Paul A RomittiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Suzanne M GilboaNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Tabassum InsafBureau of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, Center for Environmental Health, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Philip J LupoDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCenter for Environmental Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USStanford University · USTexas Department of State Health Services · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
New York State Component A: BD-STEPS II CoreU01DD001227 · DD · CENTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · PI HOWLEY, MEREDITH M · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
CALIFORNIA CENTER OF BD-STEPS II FINDING CAUSES AND PREVENTIVES OF BIRTH DEFECTSU01DD001226 · DD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAW, GARY M · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD000491NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001039NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001226NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001227NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001229NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001285NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001306NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there is evidence in experimental model systems that exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is linked with congenital heart defects (CHDs), few studies have examined the association in humans. We conducted a case-control study to examine the association between maternal exposure to PAHs and CHDs in offspring using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) (1997-2011).

methodsWe obtained detailed information on maternal occupation during the month before to three months after conception. Expert raters, masked to case-control status, assessed job descriptions to assign categorical levels of exposure. Categories were quantitatively mapped to estimate cumulative exposure to PAHs, incorporating exposure intensity, frequency, work duration, and work hours. Quartiles were generated for cumulative maternal exposure to PAHs. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression for quartiles of PAH exposure and six CHD groupings (e.g. conotruncal) and specific subtypes (e.g. tetralogy of Fallot [ToF]). Final models were adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, anticonvulsant use, folic acid supplementation, and study center.

resultsThere were 4,775 case and 7,734 control infants eligible for the study. The prevalence of occupational exposure to PAHs was 10.2% among both case and control mothers. In adjusted analysis, compared to mothers with no occupational PAH exposure, those in the highest quartile of exposure were more likely to have offspring in the conotruncal heart defects group (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.00-2.00), and with ToF (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.21-2.78).

conclusionsWomen in the highest quartile of estimated cumulative occupational PAH exposure during early pregnancy were more likely to have offspring with conotruncal heart defects, specifically ToF, compared to women with no occupational PAH exposure. Other comparisons between PAHs and other CHDs subgroups did not show any statistically precise associations.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalOccupational ExposurePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaternal ExposurePregnancyRisk FactorsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsCongenital heart defectsOccupational healthPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID32335433
PMCPMC8756335
OpenAlexW3017121100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.