Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32334964›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

Revisiting pharmacy-based naloxone with pharmacists and naloxone consumers in 2 states: 2017 perspectives and evolving approaches.

Traci C Green, Elizabeth Donovan, Brittany Klug, Patricia Case, Janette Baird, Dina Burstein, Abigail Tapper, Alexander Y Walley, Jeffrey Bratberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Considering the Potential Benefits of Over-the-Counter Naloxone.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Traci C Green
Elizabeth Donovan
Brittany Klug
Patricia Case
Janette Baird
Dina Burstein
Abigail Tapper
Alexander Y Walley
Jeffrey Bratberg

Funding

Intervention to Increase Naloxone Engagement and Distribution in Community Pharmacies: A Four-State Randomized TrialR01DA045745 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, TRACI C · 2018 to 2021
$3.1M
Advancing Patient Safety Implementation through Pharmacy-Based Opioid Medication Use ResearchR18HS024021 · AHRQ · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREEN, TRACI C · 2015 to 2015
$1.3M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS024021NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPharmacies provide accessible sources of naloxone to caregivers, patients taking opioids, and individuals using drugs. While laws permit expanded pharmacy naloxone access, prior work identified barriers like concerns about stigma of addiction and time constraints that inhibit scale-up. We sought to examine similarities and differences in experiences obtaining naloxone at the pharmacy over a 1-year period in 2 states, and to explore reactions from people with opioid use disorder, patients taking opioids for chronic pain, caregivers of opioid users, and pharmacists to communication tools and patient outreach materials designed to improve naloxone uptake.

designEight focus groups (FGs) held December 2016 to April 2017 in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. SETTING AND

participantsParticipants were recruited from pharmacies, health clinics, and community organizations; pharmacists were recruited from professional organizations and pharmacy colleges. OUTCOME MEASURES: The FGs were led by trained qualitative researchers using a topic guide and prototypes designed for input. Five analysts applied a coding scheme to transcripts. Thematic analysis involved synthesis of coded data and connections between themes, with comparisons across groups and to first-year findings.

resultsA total of 56 individuals participated: patients taking opioids for chronic pain (n = 13), people with opioid use disorders (n = 15), caregivers (n = 13), and pharmacists (n = 16). Fear of future consequences and stigma in the pharmacy was a prominent theme from the previous year. Four new themes emerged: experience providing pharmacy naloxone, clinician-pharmacist-partnered approaches, naloxone coprescription, and fentanyl as motivator for pharmacy naloxone. Prototypes for prompting consumers about naloxone availability, materials facilitating naloxone conversations, and posters designed to address stigma were well received.

conclusionsExperiences dispensing naloxone are quickly evolving, and a greater diversity of patients are obtaining pharmacy naloxone. Persistent stigma-related concerns underscore the need for tools to help pharmacists offer naloxone, facilitate patient requests, and provide reassurance when getting naloxone.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersPharmaciesPharmacyHumansMassachusettsNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsPharmacistsRhode IslandNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID32334964
PMCPMC10948012
OpenAlexW3012834857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.