Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32334604›Full record

Observational studyHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5 L: population norms for the capital of Iran.

Zahra Emrani, Ali Akbari Sari, Hojjat Zeraati, Alireza Olyaeemanesh, Rajabali Daroudi

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health-related quality of life and utility values among patients with anxiety and/or depression in a low-income tertiary care setting: a cross-sectional analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zahra EmraniDepartment of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina Ave, Tehran, 1417613191, Iran.
Ali Akbari SariDepartment of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina Ave, Tehran, 1417613191, Iran.
Hojjat ZeraatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza OlyaeemaneshNational Institute for Health Research & Health Equity Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rajabali DaroudiDepartment of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina Ave, Tehran, 1417613191, Iran. rdaroudi@sina.tums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-4114

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 94-01-159-28771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEQ-5D is the most commonly used generic preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The current study aimed at estimating the HRQoL index scores using EQ-5D-5 L measure in the capital of Iran; moreover, identifying some determinants of the HRQoL.

methodsA sample of 3060 subjects was selected by a stratified random sampling method from the general adult population of Tehran. Face-to-face interview was conducted to fill out the questionnaire, in this cross-sectional survey. EQ-5D-5 L utility score were estimated using an interim value set, based on a crosswalk methodology. Additionally, the relationships between HRQoL and sociodemographic characteristics were tested by generalized linear model, using STATA version 13.

resultsThe mean ± standard deviation utility and EQ-VAS scores were 0.79 ± 0.17 and 71.72 ± 19.37. The utility scores ranged 0.61 ± 0.19 in > 69 year-old females to 0.88 ± 0.12 in < 30 year-old males. In mobility, self-care, and usual activity dimensions, most of the respondents reported "no problems" (70.47, 90.62, and 76.34%, respectively). However, in anxiety/depression and pain/discomfort dimensions, most of the respondents had problems (53.23 and 54.03%, respectively). Females had lower utility score than males; the utility score reduced with age increase; the educational level lead to higher utility scores; and the utility scores of individuals without spouse (divorced or widowed) were lower than those of the married individuals and never married ones.

conclusionsThe current study reported HRQoL norm data for the general adult population in the capital of Iran; these data could be very useful for policy making and economic evaluations. A significant percentage of people in Tehran reported anxiety/ depression, which highlights the risk of psychological problems. Effective interventions are needed to increase their HRQoL, especially for the vulnerable groups of the community.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdultAgedAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSex DistributionSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesEQ-5DHealth related quality of lifeIranUtility score

Identifiers

PMID32334604
PMCPMC7183694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.