Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32334574›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Understanding hand hygiene behaviour in the intensive care unit to inform interventions: an interview study.

Kathryn Lambe, Sinéad Lydon, Caoimhe Madden, Jenny McSharry, Rebecca Marshall, Ruth Boylan, Aoife Hehir, Molly Byrne, Omar Tujjar, Paul O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementing strategies to prevent infections in acute-care settings.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathryn LambeDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Sinéad LydonIrish Centre for Applied Patient Safety and Simulation, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Caoimhe MaddenDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Jenny McSharrySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Rebecca MarshallDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, University Hospital Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Ruth BoylanThe College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Aoife HehirSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Molly ByrneSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Omar TujjarDepartment of Anaesthetics, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
Paul O'ConnorDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland. paul.oconnor@nuigalway.ie.

Funding

Health Research Board HRA-HSR-2015-1071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving hand hygiene (HH) compliance is one of the most important, but elusive, goals of infection control. The purpose of this study was to use the capability (C), opportunity (O), motivation (M), and behaviour (B; COM-B) model and the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to gain an understanding of the barriers and enablers of HH behaviours in an intensive care unit (ICU) in order to identify specific interventions to improve HH compliance.

methodsA semi-structured interview schedule was developed based upon the COM-B model. This schedule was used to interview a total of 26 ICU staff: 12 ICU nurses, 11 anaesthetic specialist registrars, and three anaesthetic senior house officers.

resultsParticipants were confident in their capabilities to carry out appropriate HH behaviours. The vast majority of participants reported having the necessary knowledge and skills, and believed they were capable of carrying out appropriate HH behaviours. Social influence was regarded as being important in encouraging HH compliance by the interviewees- particularly by nurses. The participants were motivated to carry out HH behaviours, and it was recognised that HH was an important part of their job and is important in preventing infection. It is recommended that staff are provided with targeted HH training, in which individuals receive direct and individualised feedback on actual performance and are provided guidance on how to address deficiencies in HH compliance at the bedside at the time at which the HH behaviour is performed. Modelling of appropriate HH behaviours by senior leaders is also suggested, particularly by senior doctors. Finally, appropriate levels of staffing are a factor that must be considered if HH compliance is to be improved.

conclusionsThis study has demonstrated that short interviews with ICU staff, founded on appropriate behavioural change frameworks, can provide an understanding of HH behaviour. This understanding can then be applied to design interventions appropriately tailored to the needs of a specific unit, which will have an increased likelihood of improving HH compliance.

Indexed as

Hand HygieneIntensive Care UnitsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfection ControlIrelandMaleMotivationPersonnel, HospitalQualitative ResearchBehaviourComplianceHand hygieneInfection controlIntensive careInterview

Identifiers

PMID32334574
PMCPMC7183607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.